DeletedUser34
Is it ok to take away civil liberties for the sake of public safety? Diggo and I were discussing this the other day and I was kinda wondering what everyone else says. Please note in this if you are American or not. Just because Americans have a vastly different view on these things than probably the rest of the world. It will allow for a round view knowing the environment of those who participate.
For my example, I would like to use shoes being removed at the airport as well as submitting yourself to the detectors. So many people cried foul at the government removing their freedoms in order to demand they go through the safety measures. I will use a result of the Colorado shooting in a different way, although I think eventually I'd like to get to the issue of Mental health care. But for now, many movies are saying no masks, no props, nothing. Is that fair, is it right? I remember the Rocky Horror Picture Show....mannnnnnn the memories. How far is to far in regards to removing civil liberties for the case of public safety. And finally, I will not get into a gun rights battle, but something has been stated that I found very enlightening. So many of our mass killings have been done by deranged people. Should mentally disabled people who can become a threat to society be treated and be isolated for public safety BEFORE they become a risk, or is the standard of defensive reaction because of civil liberties still the way to go?
For my example, I would like to use shoes being removed at the airport as well as submitting yourself to the detectors. So many people cried foul at the government removing their freedoms in order to demand they go through the safety measures. I will use a result of the Colorado shooting in a different way, although I think eventually I'd like to get to the issue of Mental health care. But for now, many movies are saying no masks, no props, nothing. Is that fair, is it right? I remember the Rocky Horror Picture Show....mannnnnnn the memories. How far is to far in regards to removing civil liberties for the case of public safety. And finally, I will not get into a gun rights battle, but something has been stated that I found very enlightening. So many of our mass killings have been done by deranged people. Should mentally disabled people who can become a threat to society be treated and be isolated for public safety BEFORE they become a risk, or is the standard of defensive reaction because of civil liberties still the way to go?