You must be talking to yourself, since I already answered this question:Ok I'll make it more clear for those who aren't able to follow along.
And you apparently weren't able to follow along.How in the world did I contradict myself?
Which we have been told not to do since books have had covers.Ranking points + GB levels is equivalent to judging a book by it's cover
No, not efficient. Quick, maybe, but not efficient. Another idiom might clear this up for you. "Look before you leap." But you go ahead. Leap before you look. Let me know how that works out for you.There's a reason humans are programmed to do this. It's EXTREMELY efficient.
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt here, and assume you weren't being racist.You see a dark abject running toward you, you do the quick math and GTFO.
Possibly? Not definitely? Really? If Player One has played every day for 3 years and spent 100k, then he is a horrible player if he only has 5M points. I know that for a fact because I've been playing 3 years, pretty much every day and haven't spent anywhere near 100k, and on the world that's been my main for most of that time I have well over 10M points. And that's with being in a tiny, sometimes solo guild for over 2/3 of that time. And the other player has 100k points and some level 3 GBs after only a month? Possibly my foot. (Besides all that, you would have the ability to look at their cities and that would probably help in an initial determination. Just sayin'.) Hopefully you were able to follow all that.Hypothetical: ALL the information I can see is ranking points + GB levels, and Player One has 5M points and level 80 of a couple things. Other has100k and some level 3s.
Which player is "better." Of course I'd wager you 50/50 the first player is! Now we learn first player spent 100k and has played every day for 3 years, 2nd player started a month ago. Now we have more information, so possibly I change my vote.