1. Changelog 1.161

    Hello Queens and Kings,
    The update to 1.161 will take place on Wed, Sept 18, 2019. There will be a short period of downtime during the update, we apologize for any inconvenience caused during this time.
    For the detailed description of the upcoming changes, please see the details here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. GvG Improvements Update

    Hello Queens and Kings,
    First up, we wanted to thank you once again for taking the time to continue to contribute your feedback on the upcoming changes to Forge of Empires, especially in relation to Guild Battlegrounds.
    For the detailed description of the upcoming changes, please see the details here.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice

Add FP Inventory [Use 10 FP] to Research Technology

Discussion in 'Closed / Archived' started by PackCat, Feb 9, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Clara Osgood

    Clara Osgood Well-Known Member

    Feb 9, 2018
    Mount Killmore, Noarsil, Rugnir, Sinerania
    As I mentioned here about a month ago...

    That most recent proposal of this same idea that I mentioned - from ~2 months ago as of right now - had polling for it closed in early March. Yes votes 41, No votes 1. So, it'll be submitted to Inno.


    Once again, this proposal is redundant & thus not needed.
  2. Stephen Longshanks

    Stephen Longshanks Forum Moderator

    May 8, 2015
    Since the idea proposed here has already been voted in more than once, and this thread is rife with off topic posts, I am going to close it.
  3. PackCat

    PackCat Active Member

    Sep 26, 2013
    It would be nice if INNO acted on the proposal.
    After 3-5 submissions with it getting up-votes each time, there is no reason for INNO not to implement it.
    At least give a reason why they are not considering it, even with mass appeal.
  4. Godly Luke

    Godly Luke Well-Known Member

    Feb 4, 2018
    Inno rarely checks the forums.
  5. Super Catanian

    Super Catanian Well-Known Member

    Oct 25, 2018
    This is in the Closed Section. There is no point in continuing discussion.
    You probably already know what's next...
  6. Algona

    Algona Well-Known Member

    Feb 22, 2015
    No. INNO does not owe us a reason for not implementing Proposals. Nor should they be wasting time, effort, and money on doing so.

    There is no possible reason INNO can give that will not either be

    A generic cookie cutter answer

    An invitation to further discussion

    An unnecessary use of time and money

    A rekindling of resentment disappointment over it being denied

    An additional reason for dissatisfaction

    Or an acknowledgement that INNO owes you an explanation for not doing something.


    What possible upside is there for INNO to give the reasons a Proposal is not enacted?
    Graviton likes this.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.