I've programmed biasing input's for other reasons. So the notion that a programmer could bias an outcome for a particular purpose programmatically is well known and established fact.
Ah. So since you've programmed bias (presumably for reasons that are ethical), you believe that others are doing it for unethical reasons. Nice logic.
And your Arc BP bit is flawed for the simple reason that you've trade the other BPs for the missing one meaning you've changed it from random odds as you've spent them and are no doubt working from memory.
And his Arc is level 45, which means he's already used 36 full sets of BPs. So if this is the same GB that he claims has 100 total BPs, but none in one slot, then he's actually accumulated 424 total BPs. And out of those 424 BPs, 36 were for the now empty slot. 36 is 8.5% of 424. So he's only slightly under average on that slot overall. Of course, he's thrown around various sets of numbers and not been specific about what GB they're all from, nor at what level the GBs were when that one slot was empty, so who knows what percentages he's really getting.
