I was listening to the radio last night and my ears perked up when the authors of a book titled, "The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas are Setting Up a Generation for Failure," were guests on a talk show. The subject was how making everything "fair" and "safe" "...interferes with young people’s social, emotional, and intellectual development. It makes it harder for them to become autonomous adults who are able to navigate the bumpy road of life." (
https://www.amazon.com/Coddling-American-Mind-Intentions-Generation/dp/0735224897)
A recent female college graduate called in and began railing at the authors about "They don't realize there really IS (name your favorite "-ism" I think this person covered them all)" and said there should be a "level playing field." One author said the only place where a level playing field was needed was a soccer field; trying to make everything "level," or "fair" was becoming a huge problem, especially for children-college graduates.
Made me think of this thread.
The sad part is, a level playing field is determined by the refs. So, if we want to be fair, we'd need to point out how people are defining the words 'fair' and 'safe'. Are they the authors 'refs' of determining the 'fouls' of this Generations soccer game? Are they the true arbiters of 'truth'?
Or just another subjective viewpoint.
We can laugh at the '-isms', but history shows us how 'unfair' certain Generations were to different demographics. If our response to people desiring 'fairness' is disdain, derision or dismissive, then I'm sure we can rationalize why we are not the '-ist' that people accuse us of being.
Perspective: U.S. Women's Suffrage is less than 100 years old.
U.S. Segregation was 'legally outlawed' less than 60 years ago.
U.S. Supreme court struck down all State Bans on gay marriage a little over 3 years ago.
If we are going to be 'fair' then we should be specific in what 'soccer field' we are playing in. Broad generalizations like "
What doesn’t kill you makes you weaker;
always trust your feelings; and
life is a battle between good people and evil people" should be considered hyperbole unless you find groups who
explicitly state those 'three Great Untruths' as 'truths'. Remain vigilant for the people and narratives telling you what 'those strawmen over there' believe. You may be surprised when you try to understand the ideology, rather than soundbites from the misguided or extreme.
Especially when we consider the political climate in conjunction with the third 'Great Untruth'.
I think it is important to see the ease of using cheap ideological cudgels. Be it for easy points in your echo chamber or to deface an ideology you are biased against.
That being said...
This is a game. A free-to-play, mobile market dominated game.
I'm pretty sure 'entitlement' sums up a lot of complaints without having to resort to cultural warfare.
I think that's the real Great Truth to all this. Entitlement leads to people demanding something.
Personally, I find it unfair that people would demand to take away pillaging.
I think it is equally unfair to be upset that others are upset over pillaging. Pillaging is upsetting, thus complaining is natural.
Let's get back to helping players understand how the current game balance is 'fair'. Even with the 'unfairness' of a 3 year Vet player being able to pillage a newbie tech-rusher.
Let's help the misguided SJWs who can will listen to reason by explaining how historically accurate the game is when we have one city grossly overpowering another. Once the conversation becomes unreasonable, maybe we should stop harvesting likes and begin ignoring the trolls instead of feeding or joining them on their level.
We all have four choices when we see the negative consequences of our game choices.
A) Get upset. Whine about it.
D) Quit the game.
those remarks are inappropriate and have been reported as offensive. you are over thinking this and it is not up to you to decide who should quit the game.
Should I report you for being grossly offended over another person's opinion who has no power over what choices you make?
How was their remark inappropriate? Can you explain in detail, similar to my soapbox above? In a way that may convince someone rather than dictate to them?
The problem is, you guys pretend there is no problem. Imo, that was pissed off that girl. I, myself, find the issue in topic to be valid -- I just don't complain, the game is screwed, no one is going to change any fundamentals.
Eh, I think it's a bit more complicated. Some players believe the fundamentals are fine. Others, like you and I, think they can be improved. Some will argue the fundamentals are immutable, others argue there can be a way to 'balance' the field.
We're not pretending. There is no problem...with the game. So guess where the problem is?
Once City defenders have the ability to have their defense AI use C-map alternative rogue targeting scripts, I'll agree with this statement.
Until then, yes, we are pretending or delusional if we are saying this game is perfectly balanced with no problems.
Whatever though. Keep yelling about the long forgotten and not cared about PvP towers.
I care. When I remember they exist. Which usually happens when someone yells about it.
So maybe that is the real issue, us getting upset when we are reminded how not cared about PvP towers are.
I mean, if we really didn't care... How did we get 7 pages on this topic? That's a whole lot of caring and yelling...
As an anecdote: I know players who compete with other players in their hood for top spots on the PvP tower. Not for the medals, but for the satisfaction of sticking it to that 'other' player who wanted to win.
I used to enjoy sweeping my towers by strategically using different era troops as I did GE. If competition in the PvP towers appeared, I'd use my pillage data to 'win'. Why? Because I had way to much time on my hands and I asked myself 'Why not win so I can see my beautiful avatar as the Champion when I scroll through all the towers?".
On a plus side, time restraints keep me from asking myself that question the past few months. Which begs another question...
Why do we have so much time to complain about complainers complaining? Now you know why I enjoy complaining about the complaints about complainers complaining. Because the complainers complaining about complainers complaining don't see how similar they are to each other.
It really is a pity more people don't actually sit around a camp fire and sing together. Or share scary stories. You know, kind of like what a forum is supposed to be about. Building a community.