DeletedUser36624
Yes. If you wish to calculate your exact probability and have kept records of each chest you opened, go for it.So, you approximated. No problem, I was just curious.
For every 10,000 trials, the expected value of 1% failure is 100. Is that not quite a few? This doesn't even count that many players will have multiple trials. I make good money explaining to people that 1 in a million is not "ultrarare" when you're talking billions or trillions of trials.Mix of 1.5% and 8% (I'm lazy to recalculate but 8% seem a bit high, no prob, though, once again) -- you call it "quite a few"?
Too lazy? Open a spreadsheet and use the binomial distribution function. Surely, such an expert as yourself knows how to specify a binomial distribution.
How can I possibly come to that realization, when you said that exact thing about something similar (spending 12K florins and getting nothing).But you probably realize that I'm not.
Sure. I've just got my third in row 100 fp from gold relic. (hopefully, you are not going to ask if I know that there's a probability of it).
That still means nothing. Denormalization means something to me as a database engineer, but I'm pretty sure that's not what you were talking about. Your example illuminates nothing. Surely you realize that any sequence of three results from three gold relics has about the same chance. Getting a tribal square, followed by 10 rogues, then medals is rarer than getting 100fp, 100fp, 100fp.
You are talking in vague terms and refusing to do any math because you don't want to come out with specifics, perhaps because you don't know how to produce specifics, but in any event because being specific would expose you definitively as not knowing what you are talking about.