Nor did he specify "great for me." .That's your spin. .A game is not "great" when so many players have substantial problems with it.
His experience is that the Tavern feature is great. That's his opinion. Your opinion doesn't enter into his subjective evaluation. Get over yourself.
No, that's a false analogy. .A particular player reporting that he has no problems is irrelevant to the existence of a problem with the game. .But you need an IQ over 90 to grasp that.
It's a perfect comparison: you dismissed Stephen's opinion almost immediately after taking Dursland to task for what you percieved as a dismissal of yours. Which isn't even what he did; all he did was express his own experience and opinion,
independent of yours. Again: get over yourself.
No, that comment is not logical either — because the serious and widespread problems began immediately after there was a programming change.
.
That doesn't change the fact that the programming updates didn't cause problems for some players. That tells us that the problem does not reside solely in the programming changes. That's not my opinion, that's basic logic. The problem is how the new code is running
on your configuration. As I stated in my previous post: it's not the programming
alone. Since others are not experiencing these problems, that tends to indicate that the problem is in the setup of those who are experiencing problems, not in the new code. If your IQ matched your estimation of it, you wouldn't have so much trouble grasping these basic concepts nor feel the need to compensate by attacking anybody who dares to have a different experience.