1. GvG Improvements Update

    Hello Queens and Kings,
    First up, we wanted to thank you once again for taking the time to continue to contribute your feedback on the upcoming changes to Forge of Empires, especially in relation to Guild Battlegrounds.
    For the detailed description of the upcoming changes, please see the details here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Cultural Settlement - Feudal Japan

    Arising from the Sengoku period of Feudal Japan, the clan of Akechi Mitsuhide has requested your help.
    As the Daimyo of his village, it is your task to lead the Feudal Japan to prosperity! Detailed information here!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Changelog 1.157

    Hello Queens and Kings,
    The update to 1.157 will take place on Wed, July 24, 2019. There will be a short period of downtime during the update, we apologize for any inconvenience caused during this time.
    For the detailed description of the upcoming changes, please see the details here.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice

Changes to DNSL feedback.

Discussion in 'Announcement Feedback' started by Stephen Longshanks, Jun 1, 2019.

  1. mamboking053

    mamboking053 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2018
    I think the changes should be emphasized. Bold letters and/or different color. Just to make it crystal clear.

    Other than that, yep, looks like you can't really say anything. Even changes Inno made wouldn't make the list if it were suggested here.
     
    DreadfulCadillac likes this.
  2. hjh102

    hjh102 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2013
    I think we're getting tangled up in language here. Any player can, at any time, discuss anything they like in the Forge Hall/Questions sections. Any player can post something that they'd like to see included in the game in the Proposals section. Items on the Do Not Suggest List will not be sent to Inno because those are the guidelines they provided.

    When a player creates a post in the Proposals section for something on the DNSL, we simply need to make them aware that their idea isn't something that we can send to Inno.

    But it's ludicrous to suggest that there are ideas that we're not allowed to discuss. Inno doesn't care if we talk about them, they do not want us to bother THEM with it (so .. no proposals sent to Inno for items on the DNSL).
     
  3. Stephen Longshanks

    Stephen Longshanks Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    I have done this on a temporary basis.
    This is exactly right. Within Forum rules, of course.
    If by "we" you are referring to moderating staff, then I agree. One of the issues we've had with the Proposals section is Forum members taking it upon themselves to declare items permissible or not before a moderator even has a chance to see them. This was one of the motivations for relaxing the format requirements. Forum members need to focus on the merits of the thread topic itself and leave the moderating to the staff.
     
    hjh102 and RazorbackPirate like this.
  4. Clara Osgood

    Clara Osgood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Worlds:
    Mount Killmore, Noarsil, Rugnir, Sinerania
    This ^^^ I do take some exception to based on my observations over the past 15 months here. Actually, one of the issues we've had with the Proposals section is that mods never looked at or responded to any of the threads except when posts were flagged as inappropriate behavior (rarely for dnsl). Even when multiple people pointed out a proposal was on DNSL, the thread typically continued without any post or action taken by a mod. Heck, I even tagged mods once on a proposal to solve an in-thread argument, to clarify if was DNSL. Only answers were repeatedly stating submit a clear outline of suggestion (which the OP already had done) & don't mod bash (which no one was doing). do you remember that thread? I think you & at least 1-2 other players privately may have had conversations with mods trying to get a reasonable answer to the reasonable question, without success.
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2019
    DreadfulCadillac likes this.
  5. DreadfulCadillac

    DreadfulCadillac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2018
    relaxing?more like tightening..
     
  6. DreadfulCadillac

    DreadfulCadillac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2018
    Lancer likes this.
  7. Stephen Longshanks

    Stephen Longshanks Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Yes, there have been issues with the Proposals section. That was one of my motivating factors in applying for the moderator position. If you have never been a mod, it's hard to convey how difficult it is. I certainly didn't until I became one. All moderators are volunteers who do this in the time they have between real life and actually playing the game. Forum regulars, on the other hand, are here seemingly all the time. So you can have 3 or more pages on a proposal in just a couple of hours. I can't tell you how frustrating it is to get on the Forum after just a few hours absence and see an already out of control, off topic thread where posters are arguing about everything except the merits of the proposal.

    We are taking steps to address this. One of them was relaxing the format requirements, because that has been the quickest road to off-topic-ville. And poster after poster chastising the new member for not using proper format has been about the least welcoming part of the Forum. Subsequently, we have adjusted the Do Not Suggest List. Some of the items we just clarified, others were added from a global DNSL that some other servers are basing their DNSL on. With that change to the DNSL, we ask that Forum regulars leave the determination of whether a proposal violates it to the moderating staff. If anyone feels a proposed item violates the DNSL, the proper response is to use the "Report" button on the proposal post, specifying that you believe it may be on the DNSL. Then it can be addressed and determined by a member of the moderating staff, who can hopefully then handle the matter without the OP feeling like they are being attacked by everybody on the Forum.

    One of the things that we would like Forum members to keep in mind is that the main reason for having a Forum is to build community among the players. Making proposals to improve the game is (or should be) just a minor part of this.
    Relaxing the format requirements. Clarifying and more closely aligning our DNSL with what other servers are using. It makes no sense, as @Agent327 rightly points out, to let proposals of certain items proceed through the process when there is no chance that the developers will look at them. The purpose of the DNSL is two-fold. It is intended to not waste the time of developers having to look at proposed changes that they either won't do or are already working on, and also not to waste the time of players proposing, discussing and voting on things that won't be submitted.
     
  8. Lancer

    Lancer Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2017

    Well, Thank You! I also agree that @Stephen Longshanks has made the forum a lot better, especially after his promotion to become a mod. That was an expected outcome though, when all of us other mods had agreed that he would be a great person to become the newest moderator.
     
  9. DreadfulCadillac

    DreadfulCadillac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2018
    we shoulda kept our old useless dnsl..just because america likes to be differnent..different dnsl's, different metric systems...i mean the only things can go wrong are useless proposals and millions of dollars of goverment money going into the trash cause of a failed nasa thing because of inter country confusion....;)
     
  10. Clara Osgood

    Clara Osgood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Worlds:
    Mount Killmore, Noarsil, Rugnir, Sinerania
    @Stephen Longshanks... if there's now a policy that forumites should "report" (via that button) a DNSL proposal as such to mods instead of replying about it in the thread itself, then I strongly suggest someone says so somewhere other than in this feedback thread. Perhaps in the corresponding dnsl stickied thread?

    We can then get our post counts up replying to the perpetrators with "Tell it to the mods instead!" ;)
     
  11. Clara Osgood

    Clara Osgood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Worlds:
    Mount Killmore, Noarsil, Rugnir, Sinerania
    Guildmate bias for that 2nd person ;)
     
    Lancer likes this.
  12. DreadfulCadillac

    DreadfulCadillac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2018
    im not in his guild anymore..lol
     
    Lancer likes this.
  13. Clara Osgood

    Clara Osgood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Worlds:
    Mount Killmore, Noarsil, Rugnir, Sinerania
    Oops. My bad... former guildmate bias, then. :)
     
    Lancer and DreadfulCadillac like this.
  14. dontwannaname

    dontwannaname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2018
    I second this. Make it clear in the proposals thread and the DNSL thread that it is the moderator's job to moderate the forum, and the rest of us should make frequent use of the report button.
    By the same token, the report button should be used to flag offending posts, and any posts that inform others of rule-breaking behavior are breaking the rules by attempting to do the job of moderators (which could be interpreted as impersonation of a moderator role). My two cents.
     
  15. Clara Osgood

    Clara Osgood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Worlds:
    Mount Killmore, Noarsil, Rugnir, Sinerania
    Yep :)
     
  16. Stephen Longshanks

    Stephen Longshanks Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    I believe that has always been the proper way to deal with such things, but it is rarely used in that way for proposal posts. I will add such a note to the DNSL later today when I'm back on PC.
     
  17. Graviton

    Graviton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2015
    Report a thread because the propsal is DNSL? That's using a sledgehammer to swat a fly, innit? Can we just ignore it and let it die a natural death instead of pestering mods about it?
     
  18. dontwannaname

    dontwannaname Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2018
    It's always an option to just ignore the post. What shouldn't be an option is to make a post saying that something is DNSL or otherwise breaks the rules.
     
  19. dpghost

    dpghost Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2017
    Do you know how it sounds?
    We won't talk about it, because anyway, it's a DNSL, and please help the moderator by reporting fellows player that come and talk about it.
    AGAIN - talk is what defines progress and if we all agree, then we are in heaven and ... beware of destroying HEAVEN
    OMG - destroying Heaven it's heresy - maybe we should burn at stake the transgressor...
     
  20. Stephen Longshanks

    Stephen Longshanks Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Listen carefully this time: The DNSL only applies to PROPOSALS. It does not apply to Forge Hall discussions. Talk about DNSL stuff all you want in Forge Hall, as long as you abide by Forum rules.
     

Top