"Completely unviable. Not in their own right, but again, you aren't paying attention. The official DC feedback thread is stuffed with complaints from people who don;t like Quests. Almost every Quest has someone complaining about it. Even the new replacement Quests of paying Coins and Supplies has already had a complaint."
To request (as opposed to demand) changes and provide possible alternatives is "unviable"? Really?
Then how is the need for change ever identified?
"Which Quests do we get rid of? The ones you dislike? The ones others dislike? All of them?
You must know that whatever Quests are used as alternatives will be complained about as well no matter how simple?"
If the same quests (or, in this case, subquests) are the consistent targets of complaints, that should give game developers a good start on a "Things To Fix" list.
No one is ever going to be entirely satisfied with their roster of DC subquests every single day. But then no one is making that demand either. But when a massive Production subquest pops up a majority of days in a week, well then the RNG needs some tweaking.
"I'm sorry, i don;t play definition games. You get a free win! Tell me what you want to call a post that essentially reads as
"I don't like this. I want this changed because I don't like this. I don;t have a viable alternative. "
and does not ask for help or advice?
:Like the original post in this thread they labeled Complaint/Rant?"
Several layers here to unpack.
First off, I would agree with you that there are such threads that degenerate quickly (or even possibly begin life as) little more than rants. You know the type: some variation of "I'm never going to play this game again because >x,y,z<".
Those are rarely constructive, though I admit they can be faintly entertaining. In moderation of course.
But a thread that begins that way does not necessarily have to end up that way. People can address the complaints with suggested fixes, such as I and others have done in this particular thread. That you disagree with the proposals does not render them "unviable"; it merely means you disagree with the suggestions, as is your right. But to make a blanket statement, as you did, that this thread is nothing more than merely another "rant" is simply not true.
Please use the quote function. Not doing so makes it difficult to respond or to know that you responded. I'd appreciate it.
To request (as opposed to demand) changes and provide possible alternatives is "unviable"? Really?
Then how is the need for change ever identified?
The latter is a good question. Got an answer? I don't. Not one that we can implement aside from trying to harvest an opinion from the chaos of these forums. *
INNO could put up a poll of some sort? I'm really uncomfortable with INNO doing such for multiple reasons.
INNO has the answer I think. They know which QC Quests are not finished. I hope. Maybe they are already changing, swapping, rebalancing Quests?
The former question makes no sense, I explained why it's unviable immediately after the word.
If the same quests (or, in this case, subquests) are the consistent targets of complaints, that should give game developers a good start on a "Things To Fix" list.
No one is ever going to be entirely satisfied with their roster of DC subquests every single day. But then no one is making that demand either. But when a massive Production subquest pops up a majority of days in a week, well then the RNG needs some tweaking.
I agree no one is asking to be entirely satisfied with their DC Quests every single day. I think it would be crazy to ask INNO to do.. The problem is what's happening collectively: So many people complaining about so many different quests.
This keeps boiluing down to this Which Quests do we get rid of? The ones you dislike? The ones others dislike?
Let me flip that: How mad are you going to be if they get rid of some other objected to Quest but retain the one you object to?
Several layers here to unpack.
You didn;t answer the question of what you want to call such posts. You don't like the word complaint, I won't use it, but I'm not going to use circumlocutions while discussong them.
Please answer the question, what do you want to call them?
**********
*You might not be happy with the results.
I've accused you of not paying attention several times in this thread. I'm going to keep betting that way.
Notice something odd in this thread? Take a look at the responses since your first post and what folk say about the Finish X Timed Productions Quests. I'm not surprised to see folk say that they object to it. Do you see it? People posting and not saying they object... They outnumber the people who object.
Been following the very discussion in Forge Hall titled Daily Supply Builfing Tasks? No? Aside from much more belligerence same thing there, the majority posting are not objecting.
When was the last time you read the official DC Feedback thread? Yup. Same thing there. The posts not saying anything about it vastly outnumber the complaints about this Quest. And the number of people who explicitly say they do not object to or even like this Quest is not negligible.
Check around, it's an interesting pattern. Interpret that how you will.
I have little doubt that the Finish X Timed Productions is the most compla'ned about DC QUest on these forums. It's also no where near a majority of the complaints. Removing this Quest will result in a lot more people unhappy then happy.
