"In addition, there is now an automatic deletion process for important conversations, to ensure that only the 500 most recent messages are saved. Any messages that are older will be deleted after 60 days. This will allow you to only have the most recent and pertinent information at your fingertips! "
This part of the message has me bewildered. In the Wiki explanation of the Message Center, marking guild conversations as "Important" meant that messages/info in them would never be deleted. This change seems to completely negate that. It seemed that the main reason for having "Important" threads that could not have messages deleted was to be able to preserve info permanently, much like the Guild Forum. Deleting messages after 60 days means a guild founder/leader/moderator will have to copy/paste (or completely retype) any important info every 2 months so as not to lose it. Seems rather short-sighted to me.
Please get rid of the auto-delete, or give us a way to save the messages if we choose./QUOTE]Are you referring to messages in general?
Those with the "moderator" guild right are included in Admin threadsI think it is broke. Do I report it here or in bug report?
I am sorry, I do not follow your question. There are members replying to an admin thread that do not have founder, leader, or moderator privileges.Those with the "moderator" guild right are included in Admin threads
Are those players marked as "Moderator" in the guild rights? The "moderator" guild rights use this symbol:
I think it is broke. Do I report it here or in bug report?
View attachment 18421
View attachment 18420
I setup a Guild Admin thread (note the star in the first picture)
I then asked for a reply from whom can see it. Expecting only the guild leaders to reply. The first reply was from a leade,r the next replies were from members. Almost all of the members replies as being able to see it.
For reference, the first reply has leader, moderator, inviter, notifier, trusted member, and battleground lead privileges
Second reply has no privileges
Third reply has only inviter privilege
Ok in that case can you please submit a ticket so we can look into it?I am sorry, I do not follow your question. There are members replying to an admin thread that do not have founder, leader, or moderator privileges.
Per the Guild-> Members section, where you can see the symbol you reference:
First reply has leader, moderator, inviter, notifier, trusted member, and battleground lead privileges
Second reply has no privileges
Third reply has only inviter privilege
No. I made a admin thread on my world. Only Founder, Leaders + Moderators were in the thread when looking at the member participants list.
Done.Ok in that case can you please submit a ticket so we can look into it?
We would love to hear your feedback about the Guild Admin Conversations!
You can find the announcement here.
We would love to hear your feedback about the Guild Admin Conversations!
You can find the announcement here.
I am pretty sure I saw the same thing. But I deleted the thread instead of getting a screen capture of that (hindsight is 20/20). I am tracking on my second test thread.It doesn't work. We tested it this morning. An Admin# tagged message was sent, and recipients checked. It initially showed only guild leaders as recipients. Then a guildmate responded. When recipients were checked again, the entire guild was listed. Non-leaders can't see the Admin# tag with the other tags, though.
There is. If you mark it as Important the first 500 messages in that thread are permanent messages. Do any of the threads you mentioned need more then 500 messages for reading purposes?Deleting older guild messages is a huge problem: we created info threads about swaps, arcs, trades, GB, battle strategy for new members and they are all gone. It was a huge amount of work. There should be a feature for permanent messages.
Are you sure that's how it works? Because the announcement is ambiguous at best on that point. It never states that the 500 limit is per conversation/thread. And it states that "Any messages that are older will be deleted after 60 days.", which is also ambiguous. Should it actually state that "any messages over the 500 limit will be deleted after 60 days"?There is. If you mark it as Important the first 500 messages in that thread are permanent messages. Do any of the threads you mentioned need more then 500 messages for reading purposes?
@Fishercat, is your test thread still active? Maybe support and check your thread settings and setup.