Pericles the Lion
Well-Known Member
I have been paying attention. It has happened before.Well, if you think the CM is going to respond to 5 or 6 unhappy players, you haven't been paying attention.
I have been paying attention. It has happened before.Well, if you think the CM is going to respond to 5 or 6 unhappy players, you haven't been paying attention.
Besides lower aged players that have advanced age units who uses diamonds to heal units between battles? How does looking at a button that says it will cost, say, 36 diamonds to "heal all" save you time? The 36 may be needed to heal 9pts of damage to one unit (critical damage) or 4pts of damage each to all 8 units (non-critical). You will still have to look at the army no matter what. When fighting with one unit and 7 rogues I only need to glance at the main unit (upper left) and the most damaged rogue (lower right). Only a split second decision necessary to proceed, swap, or (rarely) heal.Sure there is. For those who like to heal units between waves of a battle, this makes it much quicker and easier. For myself, it makes deciding whether or not to switch out units much, much quicker.
Maybe INNO has no data on this and the "heal all" button is some whiz kid's bright idea, an idea that's received overwhelming criticism from the players that bother to provide feedback. My "maybe" is as worthless as yours.Maybe Inno has data that shows the majority of players who heal units tend to heal them all. Maybe there's thousands of players this will benefit that we'll never hear from. Just a faster way for them to fight and spend.
He will never say that because he bleeds Inno. You will never find a forum moderator quite like him. All he does is argue in favor of any changes Inno makes. The guy should be removed from this positionSo your trying to Say there is no differences to before and your able to fight exactly in the same way before update??
You cant be serious. I can imagine that in a regular setting I would outfight you 12-1 . So for you of course it doesnt matter.No, it can be solved by one simple adjjustment...by you. The placement is fine. If it's a problem for you, then you are the problem.
Seriously now. I play on 10 worlds and fight every day on all but one...and as soon as it gets into Iron Age I will be fighting every day in it, too. No additional mouse movements have been required in any of my fights so far. I adjusted to the new placement of the "OK" button in seconds.
Yeah, my bad. GE and PVP Arena. If you all would like, I could go take a few GvG tiles just to test that...but I know there will be no problems doing that, either.
Since most of the people that are fine (or even happy) with the change don't come here, but the few that don't like it always do, it makes it look like this is an unpopular change. I doubt that it is. I would bet anything that the vast majority of players either don't care about it, didn't even notice it, or like it.
You do realize that it's only a tiny fraction of the player base that even participates in GvG, right? And of that tiny fraction, an even smaller fraction is possibly negatively affected by this. And as I said, I would bet that literally 90% of the active player base either likes it, doesn't care or hasn't even noticed it.
I hear you there man. Any fighter with volume will not like this at all.I have 155K fights in Q in 2 years, obviously the one or 2 saying that they like it don't fight much.
Yeah this move does nothing to address macro users, it actually empowers them. They make adjustments to the macro and they wont skip a beat. Meanwhile everyone else will be hitting the heal all button over and over with tons of misclicks along the way. Its like Sunday night after rankings get locked but worse. Totally awful way to ruin a game. Inno this is a time to listen to your players and go a different direction than this. How about something in settings that if we turn it off the heal all button wont be present. It is a simple solution but for those who want to use it like Agent they still could.Seriously - I can't believe anybody with any experience with GVG would seriously defend this move. All Inno did was handicap the players that followed the rules in order to benefit the Cheating Guilds to give them even MORE of an advantage.
Nah that won't work. They want to fix it - find the cheaters and go after them and make sure each world is notified. You kick five or six people publicly for cheating with macros this nonsense stops quicklyI feel the only way to truly stop auto-bot/auto-clickers/macros (or whatever the current term is for them) is the randomize the buttons (retreat/auto battle/start next battle) on 2 wave battles and move the Ok button randomly between the 3 spots (where it is at and the spaces to each side) on the results screen.
But Inno will face a ton (or majority) animosity of the forum users. A lot more than the heal all button location is currently receiving.
I know this will be fact, because people have complained about the ok not lining up when they removed the PvP towers results.
I feel the only way to truly stop auto-bot/auto-clickers/macros (or whatever the current term is for them) is the randomize the buttons (retreat/auto battle/start next battle) on 2 wave battles and move the Ok button randomly between the 3 spots (where it is at and the spaces to each side) on the results screen.
But Inno will face a ton (or majority) animosity of the forum users. A lot more than the heal all button location is currently receiving.
I know this will be fact, because people have complained about the ok not lining up when they removed the PvP towers results.