Perhaps if people used the correct nomenclature when referring to the use of an exploit rather than an actual bot they'd be taken more seriously.
@Podling & everyone else jumping up and down screaming BOTTERS!: In my experience, I'd have to say that your assertion that non-"botters" (aka, cheaters, blah-de-blah, when what you mean is exploiters who bought an auto-clicking mouse or joystick which is NO different than a hot-key on a keyboard in terms of results) benefit from them is just, well, a bunch of Hooey.
I do not choose to use the exploit. I am a slow clicker. Every click-test I've ever taken puts me in the rank of turtles, snails, and other things that bide their time, not win sprints. Yet somehow I manage to get between 900-1200 fights in per day of the season so I'd have to argue that the purported "botters" of my guild are benefitting from ME, not the other way around. Are we as a community suppposed to punish everyone who's successful just because they're successful?
You don't have to take my word for the incorrect use of the terms. Bots, hacks, cheats, cheat codes, God Mode, and all of the other jargon from the computer and computer gaming industry has been around forever now and while it might change meaning somewhat based on current technologies it still holds true to it's base meaning. The Internet companies who develop, manufacture, and distribute this stuff are the ones who define these words! They know what they are and are not willing to accept happens to their very expensive, very exclusive, proprietary software! If you want them, in this case, Inno, to take you seriously, speak their language, not the one you learned when you were camped out in your living room playing your Nintendo, Sega Genesis, XBox, or PS2. So keep on calling that leapard a cheetah but it's still a leapard under all of those coats of paint y'all keep putting on it's fur.
This subject comes up over and over again not because it's not being "fixed" or that Inno keeps ignoring a perceived problem, but because the people who scream the loudest keep starting back at the beginning, giving absolutely no credit whatsoever to the fixed problems that have already happened due to the developer being able to investigate and act upon
reliable reports.
Did it ever once occur to those who are so hopping mad that they might just try to understand the underpinning technology behind the platform? It's like y'all are calling electricians to come into your home and fix your water leaks. Both systems use conduit but dang, that's about all they have in common.
