Podling
Active Member
Saying I benefit is kind of dopey. If what your ilk claim is true about the cheaters causing or heavily contributing to the lag problem, not to mention how "It is destroying the game..." that doesn't benefit me. I would be just as greatly affected (negatively) as the next person. Besides, who is to say they aren't in your guild too? Or every fighting guild for that matter? I guess that makes us all even; no benefit to anyone. Well, save for the bot user.
Nothing is to say they aren't in my guild too. I haven't seen anything to make me believe that anyone currently in my guild is cheating but that doesn't meant they aren't. I have, in the past, seen ample evidence of cheating in various guilds I've been in. So yes, I probably benefitted from it as well. That doesn't mean I like it, support it, or want it to continue. Even if it means finishing first in GBG every season, it would still cheapen the win for me, and I suspect for most people who aren't so quick to knee jerk deny the problem.
Besides anecdotal claims, assertions and accusations, I have never actually seen evidence of bots. I have seen the websites advertising them and have had people send links to videos "proving" their use. Very compelling but not verified, confirmed nor bonified factual. Maybe they are being used, maybe they are not. Accusing others of using them without definite proof not only gets old, but it is also unfair. It also diverts attention away from INNO for NOT fixing lag.
You've never seen evidence? Or you've never seen 100% proof? Which is it. The evidence isn't exactly hidden under mutlple layers of obfuscation - most of it is right out in the open. 100% proof from an outside obeserver isn't going to happen - so those of us who do, from time to time, make posts about the bot problem would really like the people (that is to say Inno) who have the actual tools and data to actually do something about it. My guess is the biggest botters are also their biggest cash cows so nothing is going to happen.
But let's assume for a moment that you're right - nobody in the game is cheating. I'll play along with that absurd fantasy for a moment. There are an abundance of easy to find videos and websites that purport to teach players *how* to cheat, and those videos and many of the websites are hosted in places that are very quick to take down content when requested by copywrite holders. Inno seems uninterested in taking even the most basic steps to protect their copywrite and to instill confidence in their playerbase that the game is fair. And if they aren't even willing to do that, then of course they're not going to take the much more involved steps needed to catch and ban the cheaters.
Sometimes there are just faster fighters. I am usually in the top 5 in my guild on launch day. That, despite dealing with INNO's lag. I have never used anything to assist me nor anything that manipulates my speed. Nothing. Yet I have been accused of cheating. Several times. INNO even contacted me once and threatened to ban me if I am using anything. (Originally, they suggested that they found something but later relented) That made me wonder... I know they were fishing in my case. If they were so wrong about me, what is to suggest they aren't wrong about widespread bot use as a whole? Nothing. If they were to watch my fighting and think I am cheating, then I have to wonder how much do these bots actually help? I mean, I am fairly fast, but nowhere close to many others. So, if they thought I was using bots, at my speed, to assist my fighting, it makes me wonder how fast the bots really are.
Please INNO, fix the lag. Fix it!
Yes, sometimes there are just faster fighters. Which is why I haven't accused any one specific person of cheating, just because they're faster than I am. Most people are faster than I am. I'm old, slow, on a mid speed computer with a mundane cable connection. There are a ton of players faster than I am. Most of them aren't cheating and those aren't the people we're talking about.
And yes, the lag in GBG is an issue that needs to be addressed. On that we agree.