DeletedUser
Mission success We still have a whole four pages of love to share %Okay I am back in lol....
Hehe, it was just a tad ironic you just chose burning at the stake as your imagery around something involving Christianity. I really wasn't sure where you were going with this next one, although your comparison to Obama's health care sold me there. One does not simply force an idea upon America, for the better or worse. Just another reason why good ol' science, and those (generally) smart scientists behind it, are going to need to bail us outA christian slur? I was first in line for the boycotts. The money here does not say in Gods we trust. It is in God we trust. It is not one nation under Gods. It is one nation under God. This is just another example of the twisting. Americans, the Ronald Reagan loving, all about freedom, my kind of people Americans are not going to stand for being told how many babies we can have. What kind of cars to drive, how to think, speak, feel, or act. I will be the first one with a gun and torch when the Europe loving, mass transit hugging, it is a liberal planet and you non liberals are just guest here thinking, people try to impose your views.
It was an example and stated as such. If the people will rebel, and the government knows this they will not push it. They know their limits. Look at Obama care lol that is not doing so well. You think they are upset about being told they must have insurance cuz the government said so. Try telling them (us) about how many kids we can have. You will be burned at the stake.... I, me, will not be joining anyone who tries this... as I do not wish to be burned along with them. I will be one of the burners lol and not one of those being burned.
Enough cited? You have me in stitcheslol doing a jarp is not citing things. It is citing the obvious that does not need to be cited. It is being ask for references and proof that 1 + 1 = 2.... And that electric cars do not need to be charged. And that when your batteries in your electric car are out, they can be recharged just as fast as I can fill my gas tank. And to show that an electric car can not pull a boat or camper or U-haul trailer like a gas engine can. And to be asked to prove that an extra load does not drain batteries at an alarming rate and kind of defeats the purpose and argument for having you.
Here is a little experiment you can try at home kids. Take a 2 of the same portable TV/DVD player and watch TV on one and DVDs on the other. Then see which ones drain the batteries first. Enough cited!
I'm not going to question there is no electric car in mass production today that can recharge faster than a regular car can refuel. I am going to question your preconceived notion that only cars fully powered by internal combustion engines can be practical in every day society. I'm going to take two stabs at proving it:
For me, and many other city dwellers, an average commute is driving through a few back streets, onto the main rood and then several clicks down the main road. Particularly for families fortunate enough to possess at least two cars, it is completely unnecessary both be capable of driving for prolonged periods towing excess load. This study comments that for families with two cars only, the most common pairing was indeed a "full sized pick up truck" but also a standard mid ranged vehicle; as you say, it's 1+1=2 that if the large truck is doing the long hauls then the smaller vehicle will be doing the domestic duties. Numerically the study notes that 31% of households possess two cars only and 35% possess three or more cars. Immediately this means 66%, two thirds, of American households could substitute one of their vehicles for an electric car. That's a minimum of 27%, a quarter, of all cars in America.
Now I return to the point I made in my previous post. We have a wonderful thing known as a hybrid car that combines the internal combustion engine with an electric motor. No idea where I'm getting this part from, Google, Hellstromm or memory elsewhere, but they operate more cleanly than a regular car engine since the ICE is allowed to operate at a smaller, optimal load whilst the electric motor provides the extra grunt. My challenge to you is to prove to me that for the remainder of American cars, a hybrid would be unsuitable. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Toyota already develops hybrids that hook into the break-pads and axles to convert kinetic energy to electricity and recharge the battery, so much so that it does not require recharging from a power socket. (Hax!) Surely there's a mild-hybrid out there with some towing power, at least enough to move a boat or trailer... mild-hybrid is certainly better than nothing, especially since your other car is already fully electric now
Last edited by a moderator: