Mustapha00
Well-Known Member
We have found fossils of temperate-zone creatures near the Arctic Circle in northern Siberia. The logical conclusion to draw is that the temperature in that area was once appropriate to sustain that type of life. Since there were no humans- and, therefore, no factories or SuVs- then the further logical conclusion to draw is that the natural, cyclical nature of climate was responsible then and is responsible now.
Notice how the "record" temperatures are being reported? You have to read closely in order to detect the feint. The NOAA, the IPCC and other government/intergovernmental agencies now compare current temperature to "the 20th century average" so they can claim an almost never-ending stream of new record temperatures. But that is a bogus metric. What they should be reporting is year-against-year averages, like comparing March, 2016 to March, 2015 or 2015 to 2014. But they will not do that because to do so would be to reveal the fact that there has been no significant warming in going on 17 years. And that data certainly does not advance the narrative, so it must be discarded.
Further, there is convincing evidence, supported by tree rings (and fossilized tree rings as well), ice cores and other sources, that the atmospheric CO2 levels have been both far higher and far lower than they are now, and that the earth's temperature was both far higher and far lower than it is now....all literally eons before the presence, much less the activities, of man. But that's yet another Inconvenient Truth.
Notice how the "record" temperatures are being reported? You have to read closely in order to detect the feint. The NOAA, the IPCC and other government/intergovernmental agencies now compare current temperature to "the 20th century average" so they can claim an almost never-ending stream of new record temperatures. But that is a bogus metric. What they should be reporting is year-against-year averages, like comparing March, 2016 to March, 2015 or 2015 to 2014. But they will not do that because to do so would be to reveal the fact that there has been no significant warming in going on 17 years. And that data certainly does not advance the narrative, so it must be discarded.
Further, there is convincing evidence, supported by tree rings (and fossilized tree rings as well), ice cores and other sources, that the atmospheric CO2 levels have been both far higher and far lower than they are now, and that the earth's temperature was both far higher and far lower than it is now....all literally eons before the presence, much less the activities, of man. But that's yet another Inconvenient Truth.