1. Changelog 1.161

    Hello Queens and Kings,
    The update to 1.161 will take place on Wed, Sept 18, 2019. There will be a short period of downtime during the update, we apologize for any inconvenience caused during this time.
    For the detailed description of the upcoming changes, please see the details here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. GvG Improvements Update

    Hello Queens and Kings,
    First up, we wanted to thank you once again for taking the time to continue to contribute your feedback on the upcoming changes to Forge of Empires, especially in relation to Guild Battlegrounds.
    For the detailed description of the upcoming changes, please see the details here.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice

Happiness Details

Discussion in 'Closed / Archived' started by Snowbelle, Jan 18, 2019.

  1. Godly Luke

    Godly Luke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2018
    Unless in PE or higher where some buildings need 2 lane roads
     
  2. Stephen Longshanks

    Stephen Longshanks Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    And this is the only possible tangible benefit to this proposal. This is information that actually is highly difficult and tedious to ascertain at present time. It doesn't change my mind, but it is one way I might find it mildly useful were this to be implemented. I say mildly useful because I've been playing multiple worlds for almost 4 years without this and done alright.
     
  3. Agent327

    Agent327 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2018
    Not if you have sand trails :)

    You still have to do the math, if you want to know what it will cost. As far as happiness goes, you will have more after you have replaced them. Basically that is enough info.

    2 store buildings yes, but as far as I know there have never been multiples of anything. Even so, 4 road tiles, wouls still not mean much.
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2019
  4. Algona

    Algona Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2015
    Sigh. Some days I just can't explain things clearly. My apologies. (I seem to be doing that a lot in this thread.) I'll try once more and then give up because I just ain't getting there and it's my fault.

    You're already teaching your students the fundamental concepts and best practices of Happiness.

    This Proposal won't make any difference to that, because you will still have to teach your students the fundamental concepts and best practices of Happiness even after you know exactly what they have in their city, all this Proposal does is add an extra step.*

    Anyway, i either explained my point clearly or not. I give up either way.



    *And oooh, boy, what a step! I hadn't thought it through until now. Ignore for now what this Proposal does as fae as making your teaching easier. What about your student?

    For you to get this information, your student has to bring up the information, write it down, and pass it along to you. And for say that tech racer in Modern that never did 'get it'? How many dozens or entries do they have to scroll through and annotate? How long wioll that take? What if, God forbid, they are as unreliable as me? Or even worse, as bad a typist as me? This is easier?

    Now what about you? You just got the information and it ain't a pretty graphic, you get to wade through a long typed list. Is knowing just how many and what kinds of roads and decos and culture buildings and special buildings (oooh, different entries for the same specail building but different Eras, even more added to the list)and great buildings (what level, gotta look that up separately) worth it? Surely this is easier?

    And a couple days later when there have been some changes you both get to go through it again! Hopefully the list got shorter... This, this must be easier!

    i guess that makes great motivation for the student to learn all about Happiness and fix everything as fast as possible. Or find a new teacher. That is easier.

    Or you can just take a minute or two to look at their city and point out what should be changed a little at a time, saving the hours of time wasted writing back and forth requesting the information, finding and annotating the information, reviewing the information and the times waiting for each step in the process.

    That strikes me as easiest.

    But who am I to be telling you what's easier for you and your students?
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2019
    Graviton and Stephen Longshanks like this.
  5. Orius Maximus

    Orius Maximus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2017
    As useful as that might be, we'd probably still have 20th century cities filled with dirt roads. It's the result of poor players rushing through the tech tree and never having enough coins or supplies to keep everything upgraded. It could be useful in cases where a road tile is behind a large building and hard too see though.

    Yeah, that makes premium roads useless. They're only like 5-10 points of happiness better than the normal roads and mismatched roads look like crap too.
     
  6. Roxana 1184 the Wise

    Roxana 1184 the Wise Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    I still think putting it in the boost section to be a bad idea. The happiness icon on the bar should be made clickable to get this info if Inno wants to put it in.
     
    Stephen Longshanks likes this.
  7. Konrad the mediocre

    Konrad the mediocre Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2014
    I agree - I don't need it but it'd be nice. I just counted my road tiles and I have about 360 spaces devoted to roads which is about 23 expansions worth (by comparison 726 tiles are devoted to GBs). Those roads give me nearly 60k happiness.
    I have VF roads. There are no premium VF roads but assuming I had OF roads, the difference in premium vs non-premium roads is 50 happiness per 1x1 tile which would gain about 16k happiness at a cost of 6.6k diamonds (certainly not worth it for me). If you need the 16k happiness you can get it from leveling up a GB (fp cost) or a culture building (space cost). I disagree with the idea that premium roads aren't worth it from awards just because 1 doesn't mean much. After all, 1 watchfire gives 4% defense which by itself is essentially trivial but many people devote tons of space to watchfire forests which they build 1 at a time. If you can gain awards of premium road tiles, even 4 at a time, you gain happiness with no cost. If that wasn't important no one would upgrade their roads in the first place.
     
    Salsuero likes this.
  8. Konrad the mediocre

    Konrad the mediocre Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2014
    Is it? You would upgrade your roads no matter the cost or benefit? Do you build anything else without knowing the cost or benefit?
     
    Salsuero likes this.
  9. Stephen Longshanks

    Stephen Longshanks Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Well, we know the general benefit. And we know the cost per road tile. And if we took the time to count the road tiles we would know both exactly. Have you ever done that before replacing roads? Or are you like most of us and just go on the knowledge that the increased Happiness without increased space used is worth it? I don't know about you, but I have never done a cost/benefit analysis before constructing anything in this game, at least in specific terms. Two questions I ask before building/buying anything in this game are: Can I afford it (do I have the resources to pay for it)? Do I want what it will provide me?
     
  10. Konrad the mediocre

    Konrad the mediocre Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2014
    No not since I got to the last era as had all the resources I needed (aside from diamonds). But when I was in the earlier eras I did except for every building except roads. I used the wikis to find the most cost effective housing and production buildings too.
     
    Salsuero likes this.
  11. Agent327

    Agent327 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2018
    I am in a position not to care about the costs or the benefit. I can cover the costs and the benefits will be higher than what I had. That's all I need to know.
     
  12. Salsuero

    Salsuero Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2017
    Not broken down the way other boosts are. I'd like to see it that way. Thanks.

    I don't think it needs to be consistent. I understand that you might like it to remain so. I don't agree with that sentiment.

    More relevant to you, perhaps... and still more relevant doesn't mean exclusively relevant.

    Sounded like a point.

    According to you. We all assumed Hillary would win -- even Trump. Not sure that wasn't a "safe" assumption at the time.

    Don't speak for me. I don't agree that I exaggerated anything. I'm speaking from experience and I already noted that other may in fact be much better at explaining it than I am.

    I think you were at least "remotely" saying that here:
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2019
  13. Salsuero

    Salsuero Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2017
    I don't expect you to understand or agree... as I've already given that up with many of the "no" votes so far. But, you think it's an extra step and I think it's helpful because I have run into MORE THAN ONE situation where having it broken down like this would've made it MUCH more easy to explain. Some people just don't have the patience to understand, lack the attention, or I'm not able to explain it clearly. I feel that having a visual breakdown like this would make a difference... and not just for me teaching, but possibly for people figuring it out on their own without me needing to teach them. If that doesn't answer your question, I don't believe I can.

    Not in my view. We're already having a conversation... and to me, it would be very easy to direct them to the boost overview, explain what they're looking at and what I think they should consider, and then let them do the work (I mean, it is their town!) -- but that is much more difficult to convey by trying to tell them to look at the individual items all scattered around their town in a non-concise manner... especially with the kinds of towns I'm talking about... when I could just say... "you have way too many decos" and tell them to look in the boost overview to see what I mean. Then, if they have questions, it's much easier to say "see what I'm talking about" than to tell them to do a bunch of math, search all around their map and count up items... etc. Look -- it makes great sense to me, and that's really all I'm trying to argue.

    Thank you.
     
  14. Salsuero

    Salsuero Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2017
    Cool with me. Make that the proposal. I don't care where it ends up. Makes great sense to me in the boost overview window. If people would vote yes, and their only issue is "where" it's located... put it somewhere else! I'm fine with that.
     
  15. Stephen Longshanks

    Stephen Longshanks Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Because it doesn't work the way the other boosts do. It is shown in an aggregate form because that's how it works. The other boosts are shown in detail because each building/feature provides its own individual boost independent on the others. The only relevant item regarding Happiness is whether your city is Enthusiastic, so that's all that is shown.
    If you look at what the majority of posters on the Forum say over time, being consistent is a much desired trait with features/mechanisms of the game.
    My main statement was "just as relevant", and I meant that in the context of the game, not my individual perspective. And nowhere did I say anything was "exclusively relevant".
    That's a pretty far fetched analogy. I won't address it because we're not going to bring politics into this.
    I didn't speak for you in any way. And of course you don't agree, that would undercut your argument. Most of us here are speaking from experience, and if you can't explain it without this feature, you're not going to be able to do it with the feature, either. It might give the learner a visual they don't have now, but it will actually make the explaining more intricate and difficult.
    You think that because you're misconstruing what I meant there. I was saying it's better that we don't add any of the things I mentioned to the Boost Overview. I said nothing about taking anything out of it.
     
  16. Salsuero

    Salsuero Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2017
    We'll agree to disagree as to the "comparison" aspect of this. I am not asking for you to agree with me.

    I'm not them. I have my own opinion, which is why I have replied so many times here and elsewhere. If not, I'd simply click the "like" button, which I also do quite often. I'm not saying I'm any more or less right than those other opinions -- simply different.

    When someone says "more relevant" it often implies that the alternative "less relevant" thing is contrarily "irrelevant" meaning the "more relevant" thing is "exclusively relevant". I made a point that I didn't agree with that. If it wasn't your intention, then your point was moot in my opinion. It didn't render my points irrelevant, just because you had more relevant ones. You don't have to agree... I'm not asking you to.

    Nothing to do with politics other than on its face. I believe it was 100% solid as an analogy. You don't have to agree. It's my opinion.

    We'll agree to disagree. I believe you were speaking for me when you claimed I was exaggerating because I was speaking for myself and you confronted my words as exaggerated. Perhaps I could've stated it differently and been more "accurate" but I believe you were refuting my personal experiences and that's what I was responding to. I'm not speaking about other people's experiences. See, the thing most of the "no" votes are doing is telling us "yes" votes that we don't need this. We know YOU don't need it. But to say that we don't because it doesn't apply to your experiences... that's not really reasonable logic. You are speaking to what my experiences and the value this would contribute toward better ones from a personal perspective. I'm speaking from mine. I'm not telling you how this would help you... that would be illogical and irrelevant. I'm talking about how it would benefit me and others in my shoes.

    That's an ignorant and absurd hypothesis, sir. Don't pretend to know what I can and cannot do given a certain set of tools or another.

    Your opinion, not mine.

    I read what you wrote. If it wasn't intended to be read as such, you weren't clear enough. "Better that we have none of them" sounds very much like you're saying "rather than add new stuff, it's better that we have none of it." I understand now that this is not what you meant. It's how it sounded to me.
     
  17. Stephen Longshanks

    Stephen Longshanks Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    There is no use discussing anything with you. You either dismiss anything that refutes your logic as "opinion" or you simply say "agree to disagree". Both are copouts and not worthy of a serious discussion.
     
    DevaCat, Graviton and Algona like this.
  18. Roxana 1184 the Wise

    Roxana 1184 the Wise Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    I vote no if this remains attached to the "Boost Overview" section. It doesn't belong there, any more than the number of boost potions I have in inventory does. If it gets moved to be attached to something appropriate, I will be neutral.
     
  19. Salsuero

    Salsuero Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2017
    And you are condescending and arrogant in some of your responses when you think you know more based on time played or number of worlds or "experience" and dismiss any and all opinions to the contrary as illogical and/or irrelevant, instead of arguing against the proposal, but instead against someone's "want" of a proposal. Not saying I'm innocent either, but do you disagree that you do that? I agree... no use in discussing anything with me. Not like I haven't agreed with anything you or anyone else has said in the past... or changed my mind.

    By the way, in my very first response to you on this thread, I agreed with you. I actually said I don't see why anyone should have a disagreement with you. Funny, eh?
    When did this position for you change? I originally agreed with it:
    (And you ignored my response.)

    For the record, I've done MUCH more than simply dismiss your points as "opinion" OR say "agree to disagree". But, at the end of the day, you're only saying the same things over and over in trying to change my mind when I'm responding with my own PERSONAL position that has nothing to do with yours. The only other responses one could have other than "agree to disagree" or to define your statements as opinions (when in fact, they usually are), thereby allowing you to have them and not actually be "wrong", would be to literally agree or disagree. Since I don't believe I'm wrong and you don't believe you're wrong... why would I say "you're right" or "you're wrong" outright?

    The reason I say "agree to disagree" is because I'm tired of you replying with the same argument that I have to continue to refute based on my own opinions and experiences... and you see it as a "copout"? I see it as a kind gesture to stop the argument. If that frustrates you... don't try to refute my personal position. If it gets to a point where your point(s) is/are not changing my mind, I'm likely to end the argument in a way that leaves your point(s) intact -- with "agree to disagree" -- not a copout, just not changing my mind, and less aggressive, in my opinion, than to flat out tell you I'm right and you're wrong, especially when the argument is mostly opinion-based, and there really is no "right" or "wrong" in my view. You may think you're arguing facts or logic, and that's fine. But if I don't agree, it's going to frustrate you. That's not my fault. Your points just aren't always going to be logical to me. If you think I'm wrong... so be it. But, if you choose to respond by telling me so, I'm likely going to disagree with you.

    I mean... why are you trying to convince me that I'm wrong on my opinion based on my own experiences? You're not attacking the proposal... you're attacking my desire for the proposal... you're telling me that I "shouldn't" want or need it, rather than address the proposal itself. You did that earlier and I disagreed with you. That should have been the end of it. I responded to your original issue with the proposal and you responded to me. But eventually, you wanted to go further into why I shouldn't want or need it... and how I can't use it... and how it won't help me... basically you personally attack my wants and abilities because you think it should be easy the way it is, even though I've already accepted that others may be better at things the way they are and would prefer this addition to make things easier FOR ME. That's not logical to me.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  20. Stephen Longshanks

    Stephen Longshanks Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    The early cities and cities where there aren't many Happiness buildings won't need this feature because it would be overkill. You can see the problem just by looking at their city. The cities where there are a lot of Happiness buildings (decos, culturals, supply buildings with plus/minus Happiness, event buildings, special buildings, GBs) will have such a long list that it will be a very tedious chore to even look at it in your own city and make any sense of it. Keep in mind that the Boost Overview window only shows you about 4 boosts in a row before you have to scroll right to see more. Imagine the amount of scrolling in some of these cities just to see them all. Every single type of building would have its own entry. Every different deco. Every different event building. All of them. In someone else's city you won't even be able to see it firsthand and will have to figure out some way for this player (who doesn't understand Happiness in the first place) to get the information from the list to you. Then you have to analyze it. Then you have to communicate back to them what you've deduced (if anything) from the list. Bear in mind that problems with Happiness are almost always with larger Happiness principles and not specific buildings. Use of culturals over decos. Constructing and leveling Happiness GBs...the right ones, of course. This is how you help someone with Happiness issues, not by nitpicking their use of specific buildings.

    It is much like the old proverb about giving a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach him to fish and he eats for a lifetime. If you give a player building- and era-specific advice about Happiness in his city at this particular juncture, it may or may not help him now, but it won't help him at all in the next era...or the one after that...
    Teach a player the basic principles of Happiness management, however, and they can easily take care of it without help in any future era. Bottom line is that this feature might...probably not, but might...be of some use in some situations. But only with a lot of tedious communication back and forth. However, teaching basic Happiness principles is really pretty simple, and doesn't take a lot of explaining/teaching skills. Just the ability to communicate overarching game principles. It is really not rocket science.
     

Top