It really seems that the new point system is really slanted on the side of the players who do the GvG 'acquire, release, then reacquire' thing (CHEATING in my book). Let's see. Get points for battles (Slanted). Get points for using supplies (Slanted). Now I am not in this game for points but others are. Those players who do this "CHEATING" are. They take over the 1st place slots in as many as 4 towers weekly with a few battles. By doing this Acquire and release they get to pick the armies on BOTH sides of the Battle Field for maximum points (CHEATING!!!!!!!). Let's see. Does 1,417,320pts for 19 battles in Postmodern seem fair??? That is 74595pts per battle!!!! How many players can do that many pts in a single PvP battle much less in multiple battles????? In my LEGITIMATE battles, 1,569,482pts in 57 battles. The math on that is 27,534 per battle. (A ratio of 2.7:1. His pts to mine.) Now, many may say "why are you complaining? you are in 1st place." Well, all he has to do 2-3 battles to beat me. That is why. Next, let's move to Contemporary Era. The same player has 7,533,120 pts in 82 battles or 91,867pts per battle. Second place has 4,533172pts in 122 battles (37,157pts/battle). Modern era: 490,490plt in 10 battles (49,049pts/battle. Second place has 285429pt in 16 battles. (17,839pts/battle). I can't see higher towers then Contemporary but this player is in the Future age so I would bet my paycheck he has higher towers that are this way. Now, don't think I am just complaining just because I want to be the one to dominate the towers. I don't!!! I only do battles about one week a month. I just think it is unfair to a lot of players who are out there! FOE needs to put a stop on this Acquire, Release, and Reacquire ability. At least, make it to where when a sector is "released" a random army is placed there instead of a "picked" army!!!!