DeletedUser28021
I did read and understand all the false data that you provided. It isn't true. And two of you saying doesn't make it any more true. I have been quest looping for months on PC, and it is now faster to do than before. It takes me less time. None of your snide comments about Inno will change that fact.
You may be right. It was previously faster to loop on iPad than on the computer. The new "improved" computer interface is not as fast as the iPad was, but it might be faster than the computer was. And the new improved iPad interface is unusably bad - lots of bugs, including missing text, and, I think, slower than the computer *was*, even with abort confirmations disabled.
If you were previously satisfied looping on the PC, I can see that you might be even more satisfied now.
I previously looped on mobile - usually an iPad, as its large screen reduced the number of misclicks, but I have an iPhone as well, and an Android phone. I made the conscious decision to use the iPad, rather than the browser, in spite of the inevitable misclicks, because the browser was, for me, slow enough that servicing a single CA city using a browser was taking too much time out of my day. (The alternatives were to drop the game, use a more conventional strategy, give up an hour of sleep, give up MoPo, or collect perhaps 4 times a week, spread over 7 days.)
With the new interface these are once again my alternatives. As it happens I've got 2 cities - one conventional LMA; one serious quest loop CA. That's down from 4, which is down from 6 - both reductions due to time pressure. (Older, bigger cities take more time, it seems.) It's looking like I'll have to either downgrade the looping city to conventional, or simply drop it entirely and play only the one that's already conventional.