Grumblenuts
Member
Oh, I'm so hurty now. Crushed, I tells ya. Rejected by tedious, judgmental blowhards again! Methinks I'll just go eat worms... (num, num, num,... belch!..)
Typical. Won't address the facts, but happy to call names and fake mock outrage in a lame attempt to elicit victim sympathies. Poor you, so sad.Oh, I'm so hurty now. Crushed, I tells ya. Rejected by tedious, judgmental blowhards again! Methinks I'll just go eat worms... (num, num, num,... belch!..)
Okay. Got rid of the hat. Happy? Too bad you can't dump that attitude as easily.Best check yourself before you wreck yourself, son. Direct that crap to your mirror... And that silly hat? It's doing you no favors!
the future is in the future so you're projections are just so much mean spirited gas.
It is the solutions that Governments propose that are overreaching. But you knew that.And the unprecedented consensus of scientists worldwide is in no logical sense "overreaching Government for what in all likelihood is just another scam"
Fully aware of that. Thanks. You're point is what?The Industrial Revolution began in the 18th century, when agricultural societies became more industrialized and urban. The transcontinental railroad, the cotton gin, electricity and other inventions permanently changed society. - History.comGot it?
Nothing but, eh? Then quote one instance to prove it from the post you're apparently responding to. Oh, and be sure to quote where I accused you of calling me names in the first place... (eating popcorn here while not holding breath)Where exactly have I called you names? You however, have done nothing but to me.
Yes, I provide links. You're so welcome! Couldn't be that I have been responding to your concerns and wild assertions as patiently as possible considering most of it was child's play to debunk decades ago, but amazin' how you jus' keep workin' real hard to hear and understand none. Just as you've worked so hard here to deny and misrepresent the scientific terms "climate change" and "global warming." Appears to be your sole purpose. I have no doubt you will continue regardless. The only question is what you gain from doing so? 'Cause plenty on the internet get paid the big bucks to do exactly what you're doing here. So if you ain't getting rich perhaps you're just crazy.I see that you've provided nothing new and you've not addressed one thing I brought up. Nothing unexpected though. You can't, so you won't.
In response to Raz's repeated presentations of clearly inaccurate and irrelevant maps (Mercator projections), by definition, "climate change" and "global warming" aren't about anything like that occurring prior to the 1800s, so wtf? Just how stupid does your buddy imagine scientists are? You don't really, do you? It's just the ignorant masses you're out to fool and, from the looks of it, doing a bang up job of it too.Fully aware of that. Thanks. You're point is what?
They base a big part of their junk science on supposed 800,000 years of ice core samples and then make projections about the present and future based on what they can supposedly 'observe' about the past. Yet anytime something from the past invalidates or even questions the assumptions the entire 'science' is built upon, you want to throw out the data and change the parameters of the discussion. So yeah, once again, you got nothing.In response to Raz's repeated presentations of clearly inaccurate and irrelevant maps (Mercator projections), by definition, "climate change" and "global warming" aren't about anything like that occurring prior to the 1800s, so wtf? Just how stupid does your buddy imagine scientists are? You don't really, do you? It's just the ignorant masses you're out to fool and, from the looks of it, doing a bang up job of it too.
Not one link that address any of the specific issues I raised. Just article after article insisting that they're right, because "We ALL say so. Just ask anyone." Address one specific fact I've given you. Just one. Any one. I'm betting you won't.Nothing but, eh? Then quote one instance to prove it from the post you're apparently responding to. Oh, and be sure to quote where I accused you of calling me names in the first place... (eating popcorn here while not holding breath)
Yes, I provide links. You're so welcome! Couldn't be that I have been responding to your concerns and wild assertions as patiently as possible considering most of it was child's play to debunk decades ago, but amazin' how you jus' keep workin' real hard to hear and understand none. Just as you've worked so hard here to deny and misrepresent the scientific terms "climate change" and "global warming." Appears to be your sole purpose. I have no doubt you will continue regardless. The only question is what you gain from doing so? 'Cause plenty on the internet get paid the big bucks to do exactly what you're doing here. So if you ain't getting rich perhaps you're just crazy.
How many people in the room had children or indeed grandchildren, I wondered. Could an audience of experienced, intelligent people really be this blithely indifferent to the devastating impacts that unmitigated climate change will wreak on the world their progeny must inhabit? These same ageing contrarians doubtless insure their homes, put on their seatbelts, check smoke alarms and fret about cholesterol levels.- John Gibbons
Why then, when it comes to assessing the greatest threat the world has ever faced and when presented with the most overwhelming scientific consensus on any issue in the modern era, does this caution desert them? Are they prepared quite literally to bet their children’s lives on the faux optimism being peddled by contrarians?
“We have been repeatedly asked: ‘Don’t you want to leave a better Earth for your grandchildren,’” quipped the comedian and talk show host John Oliver. “And we’ve all collectively responded: ‘Ah, fuck ’em!’” This would be a lot funnier were it not so close to the bone.
I question the science, therefore I'm evil and uncaring.