The CDC stats on abortion, should work for your purposes. Though if you bothered to educate yourself on the facts, you would already know this.
In fact I do, which is why I asked for a source. To be clear, I was not previously, I have no issue with your claim that most all abortions are performed early. What I'd like a source on is your claim that,
And those abortions are almost always d/t the mother being at medical risk.
From, the CDC
In 2015, almost two thirds (65.4%) of abortions were performed at ≤8 weeks’ gestation, and nearly all (91.1%) were performed at ≤13 weeks’ gestation. Few abortions were performed between 14 and 20 weeks’ gestation (7.6%) or at ≥21 weeks’ gestation (1.3%). During 2006–2015 the percentage of all abortions performed at >13 weeks’ gestation remained consistently low (≤9.0%). Among abortions performed at ≤13 weeks’ gestation, a shift occurred toward earlier gestational ages, with the percentage performed at ≤6 weeks’ gestation increasing 11%.
I cannot find in the CDC report any tracking of the reasons for the abortions within the various gestational periods, just the total number performed in each category. I understand that your claim is the current talking point about late term abortions, but I've yet to find data to support the claim, and every doctor I've spoken to about this specific issue has yet to come up with a scenario where an emergency c-section saving both the mother and the baby is not the default.
None have been able to think of any instance where crushing the skull of a nearly full term infant, then ripping it apart piece by piece from the mother's womb, without anesthesia, when the mother's life is truly at risk is the scenario that provides the 'best possible outcome' for the mother.
So as the one making the claim, source please. I cannot find one.
While you're at it, care to comment on these words from Virginia Governor Northam, a medical doctor, describing the actual scenario now allowed in New York and would have been had they passed matching legislation in Virginia?
So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. So I think this was really blown out of proportion.
Hearing these words chills me to the bone. Let's keep a viable baby comfortable while we have a discussion with the mother about it not being too late to abort the already born viable baby? Y'all want to use euphemisms, fine. But at least use the right one. Infanticide. That's scary.
Here's another quote I find disturbing from Emily Ratajkowski. Not sure who she is, apparently some celeb darling voice du joir whose inserted herself into the debate.
This week, 25 old white men voted to ban abortion in Alabama even in cases of incest and rape. These men in power are imposing their wills onto the bodies of women in order to uphold the patriarchy and perpetuate the industrial prison complex by presenting women of low income opportunity the right to chose not to reproduce. The states trying to ban abortions have the highest proportions of black women living there. This is about class and race and is a direct attack on the fundamental human rights women in the US deserve and are protected by under Roe v Wade. Our bodies, out choice.
Wow, sounds all SJWish. Cool. Not so fast. Let's delete a few lines, do a bit of rearranging and we get this. Her true thoughts.
The states trying to ban abortions have the highest proportions of black women living there. This is about class and race. These men in power are imposing their wills onto the bodies of women in order to uphold the patriarchy and perpetuate the industrial prison complex.
This sounds a whole lot like Eugenics, plain and simple. "We need to make sure black women have access to abortion so they don't birth black men who will only dominate women and end up in prison." Another statement that chills me to the bone.
How is that any different than these quotes from Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger?
“We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”
“I accepted an invitation to talk to the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan.”
"They are…human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ’spawning… human beings who never should have been born."
"Knowledge of birth control is essentially moral. Its general, though prudent, practice must lead to a higher individuality and ultimately to a cleaner race. Birth control is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defective."
How about this one from State Representative John Rogers (D-AL) summing up today's pro-abort mentality,
“Some kids are unwanted, so you kill them now or you kill them later. You bring them in the world unwanted, unloved, you send them to the electric chair. So, you kill them now or you kill them later.”
Eugenics. No way around it. From a black man, no less. These are chilling statements.
With statements like that, and results like this,
In 2012, there were more black babies killed by abortion (31,328) in New York City than were born there (24,758), and the black children killed comprised 42.4% of the total number of abortions in the Big Apple, according to a report by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
In total, there were 73,815 abortions, which means the 31,328 black babies aborted comprised 42.4% of the total abortions. For Hispanic women, there were 22,917 abortions in New York City in 2012, which is 31% of the total abortions.
Black and Hispanic abortions combined, 54,245 babies, is 73% of the total abortions in the Big Apple in 2012.
I'm in favor of ending abortion, because I'm in favor of ending eugenics. This type of thinking leads to crimes against humanity.
54,000 back and brown babies killed in a single year, in a single city. That's not okay with me, even if it was their own mothers choosing it. You may see it differently, but I'm seeing a very successful eugenics program funded by me, the American taxpayer. That's not okay with me.
You don't need to be religious to share that point of view, you just have to be 'woke'. Like, woke woke, eyes wide open woke. Not eyes wide shut SJW asleep woke. Abortion=Eugenics=Abortion=Eugenics. Wake up.
