Senior Ingame Moderator
It's not concerning for it to be a catch 22 when its obviously designed to be either catch 22 or trap in a debateIf you find this to be a catch 22, that would be concerning. As this clearly acknowledges the value of the embryos, they do not have the same value as a living person. That should be the take away.
I know I already replied to this before but thought popped into my headIf there is something happening inside those organs the woman does not want to be happening they are not working as SHE intends them to and should be given the right to correct that if she chooses
Have you looked at all the warning labels on products? Like peanuts have "warning contains peanuts". Chainsaws warn not to put hands and genitals into moving saw. Clothes say not to put next to heaters.
The labels are there because people use things against the products design and when they do they get hurt or die.
She might not intend for her body to function, but it's working precisely the way it was designed to.