wiserpenny
Member
Just moved to AF over the weekend and am looking at the mess of units there. Still working my Hovertanks for now by trying to decide if something up here should be better. I know everyone says "just keep using hovers", but just because everyone says it doesn't mean it is right. So why not behemoths? They look like a beefed up version of hovers with only downside being a slightly smaller range. both have force field. Behemoth even gets better terrain bonuses. What am i missing here?
I've also heard FOE hints dude say he uses battle fortresses. These have reactive armor. Not sure i've really understood why this is better than force field. I understand hovers used to have this and people said it was overkill. but battle fortresses don't have the ability to hide anywhere like behemoths do.
So those of you who have blazed the trail before me... why keep rocking hovers? why not one of these two units?
I've also heard FOE hints dude say he uses battle fortresses. These have reactive armor. Not sure i've really understood why this is better than force field. I understand hovers used to have this and people said it was overkill. but battle fortresses don't have the ability to hide anywhere like behemoths do.
So those of you who have blazed the trail before me... why keep rocking hovers? why not one of these two units?