• We are looking for you!
    Always wanted to join our Supporting Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
    Take a look at our recruitement page for more information and how you can apply:
    Apply

Who's your favorite Harry Potter character?

Which is better; Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings?

  • Total voters
    10

nevilleweasley

Member
xivarmy said:
The harry potter movies were mostly enjoyable except for deathly hallows - even as a two part movie it felt awfully rushed and lacking a sense of continuity. I think they just tried too hard to include everything from the last very large book and in the process everything missed a lot of context. I think the script needed more editing to make a story that flowed well inside their time constraints. Or having not actually read the books, maybe the last book really is just an awfully forced conclusion to an otherwise enjoyable series :p
Click to expand...
Deathly hallows book was great. i do think that they screwed up the movie, so much information was left out, and really dislike how they did the battle of hogwarts. i am super excited for the tv show, and am hoping they put in a LOT of information the left out.
 
Ebeondi Asi

Ebeondi Asi

Well-Known Member
Someone tell Shamon they are having a conversation. Something he would not remotely understand.
He cannot read my critique since he has blocked me. so basically he cannot see my posts.
Which is actually funny as can be.LOL
 
Johnny B. Goode

Johnny B. Goode

Well-Known Member
Interesting that no one has mentioned Game of Thrones. I never saw any of the TV series. I did get a free preview of the first few chapters of the first book on my Kindle and almost fell asleep reading it. That was enough for me. Hunger Games and Twilight were more interesting than that. And that's not saying much.
 
Ebeondi Asi

Ebeondi Asi

Well-Known Member
Mentioning Deathly Hallows. so few really talk about Harry Potter had all three and what that signified? He threw the ring away, broke the wand. I forget what he did with the cloak.
 
stymie of Suwannee

stymie of Suwannee

Active Member
Harry Potter is a Frankenstein monster made from chunks of plagiarism sewn together. It‘s a shame they split There and Back Again (The Hobbit) into three movies. Fairly well ruined it, as it being the arch type of fantasy RPG. Simple, nearly non-sequitur. Rawlings couldn’t write a simple story unless we all heard it as children.
 
PJS299

PJS299

Well-Known Member
stymie of Suwannee said:
Harry Potter is a Frankenstein monster made from chunks of plagiarism sewn together. It‘s a shame they split There and Back Again (The Hobbit) into three movies. Fairly well ruined it, as it being the arch type of fantasy RPG. Simple, nearly non-sequitur. Rawlings couldn’t write a simple story unless we all heard it as children.
Click to expand...
Um, sorry. Didn't get you there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top