That seems to be a very poor decision that exhibits the same sort of managerial finesse as using a hammer to swat flies.
Here is the item you cited from "Do Not Suggest List":
Ability to prioritize which buildings in your city you want aided first
1. Just as the meaning of any legislation is affected by its legislative history, a
rational consideration of this forum rule would acknowledge the history that preceded its implementation. This item was placed on the list in the wake of numerous requests for prioritizing
particular buildings for motivation or polishing, during the first few months after the "Aid" algorithm was first implemented. My proposal does not do that.
2. My proposal
maintains the random selection process and does not prioritize any particular building. It does not violate the spirit of why the prohibition was added to the DNSL list. It is about the overall
structure of the "Aid" algorithm, not about particular buildings.
3. It's very insulting to bureaucratically dismiss volunteer efforts to improve a profit-making business venture — not on the basis of the merits of such efforts, but on the basis of a narrow judgment of whether the effort shall be "worthy" of consideration. This dismissal is especially galling in light of the glaring hypocrisy of the current system —
as illuminated in the discussion.
4. I have numerous other ideas to improve Forge of Empires.
Why should I bother if this is the sort of inflexible treatment to expect?
If this is how imaginative ideas are killed, then you can count me as angry and disillusioned. But if the proposal still has a chance to be considered, then I would like to know how.
.