I feel that way personally. It adds an additional challenge to layout if you can't change the orientation of the building you really want.I will put this another way. What player can tell me that they are opposed to buildings you can rotate because the game is better without that sort of feature? Really?
I am opposed to rotating buildings because the game is better without that feature. No self-respecting city building game should allow the rotating of buildings. Might as well just make them all the same size, or at least all square if you're going to do that. It completely takes a major challenge out of laying out a city.I will put this another way. What player can tell me that they are opposed to buildings you can rotate because the game is better without that sort of feature? Really?
I will put this another way. What player can tell me that they are opposed to buildings you can rotate because the game is better without that sort of feature? Really?
The game is actually designed and rendered in 3D, before being downscaled, compressed, and flattened to 2D artwork and animations for the game. If it wasn't, most players wouldn't own hardware capable of running the game smoothly. But the files do exist... I wish I had them lol
I played a railroad game once and the third version was 3D. Ruined the game for me because it was almost impossible to maneuver the screen to get the perspective you needed.
I read your comment as, 'the game is better without more consumer options because Inno/foe would have to work harder to give them what they want before we make our pile and go out of business, open a new internet offering, and give players what they were asking for 5 years ago'.
No one has said that not enabling rotation is "some sort of high end intellectual pursuit". There is a consensus that preventing rotation provides a welcome element of challenge to the game. What rings hollow, to me, is your justification for enabling rotation (i.e. "aesthetics"). If buildings could rotate then nearly every city would be laid out as a simple grid with all buildings' long side oriented along the same axis. What is aesthetic about this? Rotation would simply make the game easier and, believe it or not, there are players that do not want the game made easier.
You didn't get that out of his comment, you got that out of your own imagination.
Kind of ironic that you would say this in defense of rotating buildings, since that ability would take away a lot of the work of building a city.
| Artist | Image |
|---|---|
| Vincent Ganachaud SAJM |
|
| Vincent Ganachaud Mughals |
|
| Vincent Ganachaud SAV Clouds |
|
| Ted Garnie SAT cMap (full quality) |
|
| Andres Romero SAV Vertical Farm |
|
We have 5 of those already
Very true, however with my intended sarcasm I meant a dedicated GB that produces diamonds every day which increase with each level. You know, something inno would never do..
Seed vault
I thought the seed vault produced supplies and just gave a random chance, it doesn't actually produce diamonds Not dedicated to diamonds.?Seed vault
It does. but at level 100 it'll pay out close to 8000 diamonds per year, and all you need to do is smack the aid all button every day.
These are the things I like to find out about. I had no idea what to expect at higher GB levels. I have too many of them to level at a decent pace..
Start with your Arc first, get it to 80, and then work on the rest. With modern event buildings giving so many FP, you'll be able to level GB quick