• We are looking for you!
    Always wanted to join our Supporting Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
    Take a look at our recruitement page for more information and how you can apply:
    Apply

Himeji Castle

wolfhoundtoo

Well-Known Member
An open mind requires you to actually consider the actual facts of the matter. Since they provided no facts it's not an 'open mind' at question here. Contrary to what many people may think, there are actual repeatable outcomes (not sure the terminology is right here but the point still remains) in random events and this have been proven mathematically already. What you really mean is you agree with him and want Inno to prove that they aren't messing it up. There's plenty of people that play this game and enough of them post here that track these items to show that in general Inno's randomness is fine. Can an individual GB be messed up? Maybe. But there's the point of asking for data sets to back up the claim that your or any individual's particular GB is busted. There's also enough people tracking things that if it was busted in general it would probably be widely reported but even if not you can't really expect that Inno is going to prove to various people posting here that their RNG is working? That's way too much work and entirely pointless as the vast majority of the people that I've seen posting here display that they don't know very much about RNG (not that I know much either but my statistic classes are still dimly accessible in my head :p ).
 

Iggy112

Member
There are two issues on distributions going on here:
1) In a number of instances, Inno does not publish the underlying distribution of “prize’ outcomes. That leaves it to players and the player wiki (which I believe Inno disavows) , to estimate the distribution by observations. While I don’t think they can/should do that for every aspect of the game, there are many instances where that would remove the mystery and allow for better planning by players. It would also alleviate suspicions that Inno is changing the distributions over time to motivate more diamond purchases (which I could support if it is an open process).
2) That leaves us with whether Inno is using a true random generator. Some of the discussion above is very true and black swan sequences do occur. players do need to accept that they will see them in game play. However, it is also true that the Inno as a business selling its product to the public, must also provide confidence that it is a fair game. Casinos have the same issue. Las Vegas and Atlantic City have regulatory bodies for fair games. Don’t know if folks are willing to play once it is perceived that a Casablanca roulette game is being offered.
 
Top