DeletedUser38090
So @Clara Osgood has made a small discovery on this post about discovering a trashcan icon on the abort button:
https://forum.us.forgeofempires.com/index.php?threads/red-trash-can-for-aborting-quests.25423/
And I wanted to see how fast an abort quest cycle with the red trash is, and how that compares to doing an abort cycle on PC, and with the abort button on mobile.
So my hypothesis was that the time it takes for aborting through quests would be fastest for the trashcan method, pressing the abort button on the phone would be in the middle, and then aborting quests on the PC would take the slowest.
My reasoning for this hypothesis is that the trashcan method requires only a swipe and doesn't require the wait time for a recurring quest to slide into view, and so it would be the fastest of the methods. The abort button method on the phone is probably faster than the PC method because the abort button on the Phone is always fixated on the same place, while on the PC, the button may shift down if one has quests that have two requirements instead of just one.
I'm using 9 quests for an abort cycle.
For those who want the results:
Here are the averages and standard deviations (standard deviation in parentheses) of each distribution
PC Method: 11.198 seconds (0.506 seconds)
Mobile Abort button method: 11.491 seconds (1.025 seconds)
Mobile Trashcan method: 10.607 seconds (0.777 seconds)
The Mobile Trashcan method, based on the constraints and controls in this experiment, is faster than the PC method and Mobile Abort button method in completing an abort cycle of 9 quests, and there is a statistically significant difference between the Mobile Trashcan method and the other two methods. Some further testing from other people may be needed to see if this holds true, as only one person was used in this experiment. Save yourself half a second doing recurring quests with the Red Trashcan!
Materials & Methods:
Materials:
Here are the averages and standard deviations (standard deviation in parentheses) of each distribution
PC Method: 11.198 seconds (0.506 seconds)
Mobile Abort button method: 11.491 seconds (1.025 seconds)
Mobile Trashcan method: 10.607 seconds (0.777 seconds)
Sample size for each: n=31
Alright, now it's time to do the significance tests to see if there is a possible significant difference using a 2-sample T-test. Significance value for this test will be .05, which is typical
Test #1
Null Hypothesis: PC Method = Mobile Abort button method
Alternative Hypothesis: PC Method ≠ Mobile abort button method
P= 0.1608
P> 0.05
There is no statistically significant difference between the PC method and the Mobile abort button method
Test #2
Null Hypothesis: Mobile Trashcan method = Mobile Abort button method
Alternative Hypothesis: Mobile Trashcan method ≠ Mobile abort button method
P=0.0004
P< 0.05
There is a statistically significant difference between the Mobile Trashcan method and the Mobile Abort button method
Test #3
Null Hypothesis: Mobile Trashcan method = PC method
Alternative Hypothesis: Mobile Trashcan method ≠ PC method
P=.0008
P<0.05
There is a statistically significant difference between the Mobile Trashcan method and the PC method.
https://forum.us.forgeofempires.com/index.php?threads/red-trash-can-for-aborting-quests.25423/
And I wanted to see how fast an abort quest cycle with the red trash is, and how that compares to doing an abort cycle on PC, and with the abort button on mobile.
So my hypothesis was that the time it takes for aborting through quests would be fastest for the trashcan method, pressing the abort button on the phone would be in the middle, and then aborting quests on the PC would take the slowest.
My reasoning for this hypothesis is that the trashcan method requires only a swipe and doesn't require the wait time for a recurring quest to slide into view, and so it would be the fastest of the methods. The abort button method on the phone is probably faster than the PC method because the abort button on the Phone is always fixated on the same place, while on the PC, the button may shift down if one has quests that have two requirements instead of just one.
I'm using 9 quests for an abort cycle.
For those who want the results:
Here are the averages and standard deviations (standard deviation in parentheses) of each distribution
PC Method: 11.198 seconds (0.506 seconds)
Mobile Abort button method: 11.491 seconds (1.025 seconds)
Mobile Trashcan method: 10.607 seconds (0.777 seconds)
The Mobile Trashcan method, based on the constraints and controls in this experiment, is faster than the PC method and Mobile Abort button method in completing an abort cycle of 9 quests, and there is a statistically significant difference between the Mobile Trashcan method and the other two methods. Some further testing from other people may be needed to see if this holds true, as only one person was used in this experiment. Save yourself half a second doing recurring quests with the Red Trashcan!
Materials & Methods:
Materials:
- Default Clock app on the iPhone
- Forge of empires on PC and mobile
- Google stopwatch timer
- Quest menu is already open with recurring quest in view
- Simultaneously hit the abort button for the first quest and hit the start button for the stopwatch on my phone
- Cycle through 8 more recurring quests by hitting the "abort" button 8 times
- Once the sliding animation for the quest has stopped on the screen, hit the end button for the stopwatch on my phone
- Record time onto spreadsheet
- Repeat steps 1-5 for 30 more times
- Quest menu is already open with recurring quest progress in view
- Tap on the recurring quest progress in order to show the backside with the abort button, and simultaneously hit the start button on the Google stopwatch timer on computer
- Cycle through 9 recurring quests by hitting the "abort" button 9 times
- Once the sliding animation for the quest has stopped on the screen, hit the end button on the Google stopwatch timer
- Record time onto spreadsheet
- Repeat steps 1-5 for 30 more times
- Quest menu is already open with recurring quest progress in view
- Swipe the recurring quest with the trashcan method and simultaneously hit the start button on the Google stopwatch on computer
- Cycle through 8 more recurring quests with this method
- Once the sliding animation for the quest has stopped on the screen, hit the end button on the Google stopwatch timer
- Record time onto spreadsheet
- Repeat steps 1-5 for 30 more times
Here are the averages and standard deviations (standard deviation in parentheses) of each distribution
PC Method: 11.198 seconds (0.506 seconds)
Mobile Abort button method: 11.491 seconds (1.025 seconds)
Mobile Trashcan method: 10.607 seconds (0.777 seconds)
Sample size for each: n=31
Alright, now it's time to do the significance tests to see if there is a possible significant difference using a 2-sample T-test. Significance value for this test will be .05, which is typical
Test #1
Null Hypothesis: PC Method = Mobile Abort button method
Alternative Hypothesis: PC Method ≠ Mobile abort button method
P= 0.1608
P> 0.05
There is no statistically significant difference between the PC method and the Mobile abort button method
Test #2
Null Hypothesis: Mobile Trashcan method = Mobile Abort button method
Alternative Hypothesis: Mobile Trashcan method ≠ Mobile abort button method
P=0.0004
P< 0.05
There is a statistically significant difference between the Mobile Trashcan method and the Mobile Abort button method
Test #3
Null Hypothesis: Mobile Trashcan method = PC method
Alternative Hypothesis: Mobile Trashcan method ≠ PC method
P=.0008
P<0.05
There is a statistically significant difference between the Mobile Trashcan method and the PC method.