Approved for Voting Allow guilds to trade treasury goods with other guilds.

[ffblackice]

I would vote Yes if tradeable to guild members, but No to other guild.

 

[Angel.]

I voted NO. If your guild treasury is weak then. It is the fault of the guild Founders and leadership team. They should be encouraging guild members to build and level treasury GBs, Also to build SoH's and Elephant citadels, as well as Event buildings that give treasury goods. Even doing quests that call for X amount of goods to the treasury. And of course they should also take the time to let the guild members know how important and appreciated their effort is.

a lot will do the other choice of the quest instead of giving to guild treasury though ,but agree with all you said

 

[Richard Rambone]

I vote no

 

[Henrik the Seer]

This can be abused by guilds for the purpose of further dominating GBG and GVG. I vote no. Part of the game is learning how to build up your treasury to meet your needs. Good Management yields good results.

This idea would be totally abused by large Guilds, with their farm system guilds. Vote No,

 

[Ironrooster]

I would vote Yes if tradeable to guild members, but No to other guild.

That would be awesome. 1 high level Arc could produce all the goods I need.

 

[Jackshat]

While my original response was more in jest, as I give the proposal more thought, such an option completely undermines the two year project my guild undertook to solve the logistics of goods use in GBG, beyond the Treasury.

We seek not to see GBG mechanics changed thru programmers to "correct" for human ingenuity that turned GBG into a farming expedition.

We only seek, and believe we've found, a contrary ingenuity to counter them. Any guild that can't fight without heavy use of siege camps, will have to learn to fight the "war of attrition".

This proposal, if approved, wrecks all the hard work and years we've put into countering the farming conglomerates, through planning, strategy, commitment, and some crazeh guerilla tactics--not coding.

No, but appreciate the proposal.

 

[FOEAgain]

NO

 

[yuan China]

agree

 

[SeaSee]

I vote No also. That is what the guild is for to help your team members not everyone else. People being people will abuse this.

 

[Sal3910]

I vote no

 

[kristina22]

no

 

[Tamastara]

I would try it out & if it ends up being abused, you can always get rid of it.

 

[Emberguard]

I would try it out & if it ends up being abused, you can always get rid of it.

What would we be defining as abuse for the purpose of removing the feature?

 

[Mando Din Djarin]

NO