• We are looking for you!
    Always wanted to join our Supporting Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
    Take a look at our recruitement page for more information and how you can apply:
    Apply

Attack gbs cost

Emberguard

Well-Known Member
Looking for cost vs attack/defence gained comparison between Zeus, coa, CdM and TA, with 1.9 contribution.

TIA
Except for the TA all straight defence and attack GBs have the exact same stats for the boosts

TA:
Lvl 10: 20%
Lvl 80: 55%

Everything else:
Lvl 10: 30%
Lvl 80: 65%


Obviously the bronze age building will be the cheapest to lvl. Game uses the same contribution rewards and FPs needed to lvl for each GB within a age. Increases for each age up

Edit:
From the en forums when someone asked at what point it's fast to lvl up Cape:
Disclaimer: None of this is official. It is based on player observation and when 1.9 can be utilised without owner contribution for 1st and 2nd
No Age: Lvl 39 > 40
BA: 37 > 38
IrA: 35 > 36
EMA: 37 > 38
HMA: 39 > 40
LMA: 39 > 40
ColA: 37 > 38
IndA: 37 > 38
ProE: 37 > 38
ModE: 38 > 39
PMod: 32 > 34
ConE: 29 > 30
TomE: 30 > 31
Future: 30 > 31
ArcFu: 37 > 38
OceF: 38 > 39
Around 40 for VF.
 
Last edited:

DeletedUser29726

Well the longer you plan to play, the further ahead CdM comes in the cost/benefit analysis as leveling it will eventually be free.

In terms of power-leveling the others through the sweet spot -> Zeus then CoA then TA as you would expect.

Once they're all power-leveled and CdM is so expensive that the FP it produces isn't a huge factor you'll be rotating through them all 2 levels at a time pretty much and can just calculate which one is cheapest next. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to calculate this in advance.
 
Top