DeletedUser36572
Ii
I read what you said, and trying to crawfish again won’t change anything. Corporations are required by law to provide benefits for full-time employees.
There is no need to argue, I even gave an example regarding the ACA. Also, to have a loophole, there has to be a regulatory statute that requires one. A corporation cannot be trying to escape a requirement if the requirement doesn’t exist in the first place.
I never suggested that some corporations don’t lie, cheat and rob their consumers and employees of benefits, quality and value. You just lack the ability to read what is written and apply critical thinking to your own ideas.
There are two ways a person can change the behaviors of a corporation, from the outside or the inside. If you try to do it from the outside, you just create requirements that lead to loopholes. If you try to change it from the inside, you have fight a long battle and prove your ideas provide for better profits, conditions for employees, and quality/value to the consumer.
Otherwise ... You are just pissing in the wind and creating more requirements with more loopholes. To fix a failure, you have to capture the failure and address the problem with Corrective Actions. And you cannot capture the problem and address the problem just because you are pissed someone in the corner office is making a pantload of money ... Envious little Unicorn Hunter.
Simply put ... If the labor movement or the government actually has/had the power to change things you like to pretend it does/did ... Then there is no reason to keep pissing and whining about the stuff they have both done a seriously piss poor job of providing you with in better results.
You’re like a guy trying to fix a leak in a water hose with toilet paper, jumping up and down screaming you need more toilet paper ... And lack the wherewithal to understand everyone would be better served if you could convince the person with the money to buy a new water hose, save yourself a crapload of frustration and continued failure, and quit wasting toilet paper.
If you seriously think you are significant to a corporation outside of what you can provide for in production or profit, then you are sadly mistaken. Stop trying to impose your will in a non-productive manner. Get smarter, earn your way with better ideas and options you can prove improve conditions for production, profit, employees and the consumer.
.
So much misinformation.
I didn't say they were required by law. What I was saying was that employers advertise themselves as providing benefits to full time employees (which they are not mandated by law to do) and then use a loophole in their own internal policies to avoid actually paying those benefits to most of their employees. This is not conjecture on my part, it is a widely known fact. As I said before, Walmart/Sam's Club is a prime example, and I know several current and former employees who can attest to this fact.
Wrong again. Employee benefits came into being due to the labor movement's organizing efforts and collective bargaining. Nobody who is familiar with American business practices is going to believe that a movement of corporations eager to give money to employees went out of their way to find "alternative methods" to do so. What you're probably thinking about is the rarer benefits that companies dole out to a few "top level" employees, not things like healthcare and vacation time for the entire workforce. Those things came about because of unions, not because of corporations.
I read what you said, and trying to crawfish again won’t change anything. Corporations are required by law to provide benefits for full-time employees.
There is no need to argue, I even gave an example regarding the ACA. Also, to have a loophole, there has to be a regulatory statute that requires one. A corporation cannot be trying to escape a requirement if the requirement doesn’t exist in the first place.
I never suggested that some corporations don’t lie, cheat and rob their consumers and employees of benefits, quality and value. You just lack the ability to read what is written and apply critical thinking to your own ideas.
There are two ways a person can change the behaviors of a corporation, from the outside or the inside. If you try to do it from the outside, you just create requirements that lead to loopholes. If you try to change it from the inside, you have fight a long battle and prove your ideas provide for better profits, conditions for employees, and quality/value to the consumer.
Otherwise ... You are just pissing in the wind and creating more requirements with more loopholes. To fix a failure, you have to capture the failure and address the problem with Corrective Actions. And you cannot capture the problem and address the problem just because you are pissed someone in the corner office is making a pantload of money ... Envious little Unicorn Hunter.
Simply put ... If the labor movement or the government actually has/had the power to change things you like to pretend it does/did ... Then there is no reason to keep pissing and whining about the stuff they have both done a seriously piss poor job of providing you with in better results.
You’re like a guy trying to fix a leak in a water hose with toilet paper, jumping up and down screaming you need more toilet paper ... And lack the wherewithal to understand everyone would be better served if you could convince the person with the money to buy a new water hose, save yourself a crapload of frustration and continued failure, and quit wasting toilet paper.
If you seriously think you are significant to a corporation outside of what you can provide for in production or profit, then you are sadly mistaken. Stop trying to impose your will in a non-productive manner. Get smarter, earn your way with better ideas and options you can prove improve conditions for production, profit, employees and the consumer.
.
Last edited by a moderator: