Johnny B. Goode
Well-Known Member
5 cities finished all of GE4. 15 chances at Diamonds. 3 Diamond rewards. 20%. We'll see how this goes next week.
5 cities finished all of GE4. 15 chances at Diamonds. 3 Diamond rewards. 20%. We'll see how this goes next week.
lol yep I had 18 chances in 6 cities - hit a total of 3 times total in ALL cities combined. : )
18 chances, 3 hits, 17%5 cities finished all of GE4. 15 chances at Diamonds. 3 Diamond rewards. 20%. We'll see how this goes next week.
Really? That's how percentages work? Thanks for enlightening us morons!18 chances, 3 hits, 17%
15 chances, 3 hits, 20%
The expected number of hits is 30% over time. It would have been more informative if you had been sharing your results since the release of Level 5. Five times more data to consider. One season is not enough to support any conclusions but five would have gotten you closer.
You're welcome. We "shills" are always willing to help the "morons" and don't let the door hit you in the butt on your way out.Really? That's how percentages work? Thanks for enlightening us morons!
I am also completely shocked that you would respond so negatively to such a simple post. Did I extrapolate anything from that one week's result? No, it was a simple statement of fact. It also was the first week I finished GE4 in all 5 active cities. Life, ya know? Anyway, that may also be the only week I ever finish it in 5 cities because the game is rapidly losing its 8 year hold on me. And Inno shills like you are hastening the process. Just so you know. I'm considering just making all my cities Diamond farms and not really having a main. Then I can just show up once in a while and collect. Keep a toe in, so to speak, just in case the game ever gets good again.
Exactly the kind of response I expected.You're welcome. We "shills" are always willing to help the "morons" and don't let the door hit you in the butt on your way out.
I'm sure that it was exactly the kind of response that you would have provided if the shoe were on the other foot.Exactly the kind of response I expected.
The diamond decrease will happen whether it's liked or not. The number of F2P making purchases and new users that make purchases has to increase. A physical server with VMWare 7 and MS Server licensing is about 4500$ for the hardware XEON CPU (128 cores) , 1024 Gb of RAM and a RAID 1 for the OS on 2 SSD disks. The licensing would be about 4000$ per year for VM and 6500$ for the MS licensing for the 30-40 servers spun up. Multiply the hardware X 2 for redundancy and $7K for 4 switches in spine/leaf config. Add a storage cabinet for the SAN at about 5000$ each for 7-8 platters at 4 TB each for SSD. Finally about 1200$ year for power for running and AC for cooling the server. This is individual server costs approximately but then you have to add the shared costs like rack administration , dark fiber at about 6000$ per month for the edge to support the bandwidth needs and finally admin of the company. They could just be using a managed SAAS cloud but at the end of the day someone has to pay for the servers and licensing and the cloud cost will be similar with a possible 40%-60% reduction in licensing costs if the cloud host uses opensource.
First, we've been over this, it's not 75% less diamonds."Mobile games developer and publisher InnoGames had a record-breaking year in 2020. The German studio saw €220 million ($266 million) in revenue, a rise of 15 per cent year-on-year. Furthermore, it is the 14th consecutive year that the company has experienced financial growth." https://www.pocketgamer.biz/news/75933/innogames-saw-record-breaking-revenues-of-266-million-in-2020/#:~:text=Mobile games developer and publisher,company has experienced financial growth.
LOL I do not agree with Impaler's assessment that it is inevitable that a fantasy game has to deliver the decidedly unpleasant experience of real world inflation because of hardware costs. It's like saying the British public HAS to fork out .5 billion (the real cost estimate) for the Coronation) while Prince Charles himself is worth multiple billions and doesn't put in a dime. NOPE, it does not have to be inevitable or required, its just gotten away with.
Here's the beef - Inno has been worth multiple multiple HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of dollars annually for years - the new owners just wanna milk the cash cow till she keels over and dies. Those hundreds of millions annually were made on the model of NO FRAGMENTS, WHOLE WELLS AVAILABE IN EVENTS, and 75%+ MORE DIAMOND REWARDS IN GE than now. Sounds like a winning model actually, and hardware was never a problem. I'm not saying this is immoral, as capitalism famously has no morality. Killing a cash cow? A debatable corporate strategy.
If Inno needs to clear its servers it can clear out millions of inactive accounts and reduce the time it takes to get rid of a city after Delete to two days instead of letting them sit there for two weeks - no moves like that whatsoever and so Inno is choosing to keep its serves bloated with non-active cities - so the expensive server argument fails completely.
@Revenant Rogue thanks for weighing in! I find your perspective helpful and enlightening.
FOE does not have 100s of thousands of people online at once lmfaoFirst, we've been over this, it's not 75% less diamonds.
Second, That €220M is not what they are making today. My estimate would place their revenue somewhere around €160M - €180M currently. That's not the cash cow being milked, that's the cash cow not being fed.
Third, if Inno was perfectly fine financially, then why did they lay off 1/6 of their staff??? That's not what you do when you're consistently making more revenue. They no doubt cut staff to help balance their loss of revenue. However, as Sharmon explained, the majority of Inno's costs are probably datacenter related. It's EXPENSIVE to host such a large game, where at any point, hundreds of thousands of players may be online.
Is this how I would have gone about monetizing FoE? Of course not! But something has to give in order to regain growth of revenue. And for right now, that's GE, and balancing how many free diamonds you can get to something that is still pretty generous imo. You don't need diamonds to play the game, and if you do, well now you can support the game you've been playing for years for free. Seems like a fair deal to me.
From my perspective, the Diamond issue (while terribly annoying) is actually secondary (or tertiary, I guess) to the other nerfed rewards in GE1-4 and the ridiculous boosts required to switch to defending army stats for level 5. It has affected my desire to continue playing this game, along with the changes to events. I have actually only collected once from my cities in the last 3 days. I have almost completely ignored the current event. The day is coming soon when I won't be here at all. Really sad when I think back to how great this game was 8 years ago, and the promise it then held for the future. Unfortunately, a promise not kept.his all brings me to my final concluding thought on the matter: I think whether or not someone actually minds the changes brought about by the overhauled GE depends on a couple of factors. The first issue has to do with whether or not you farmed diamonds before the change, and whether a significant portion came from GE. The second factor ultimately comes down to what you actually use diamonds for.
From my perspective, the Diamond issue (while terribly annoying) is actually secondary (or tertiary, I guess) to the other nerfed rewards in GE1-4 and the ridiculous boosts required to switch to defending army stats for level 5. It has affected my desire to continue playing this game, along with the changes to events. I have actually only collected once from my cities in the last 3 days. I have almost completely ignored the current event. The day is coming soon when I won't be here at all. Really sad when I think back to how great this game was 8 years ago, and the promise it then held for the future. Unfortunately, a promise not kept.
FOE does not have 100s of thousands of people online at once lmfao
Actually, no and no. I am an established Diamond farmer who has always relied on Wishing Wells first and foremost. And since I've been collecting them for quite a while, this nerf of Diamonds in GE is really just an annoyance. Certainly doesn't rise to the level of having my "feet knocked out from underneath" me.but I can also appreciate the fact that established diamond farmers who've grown very accustomed to making a certain amount of diamonds each week, and high level fighters who built their cities to be the most attack-efficient possible, have all basically had their feet knocked out from underneath them.
To this, since I don't think a lot of people on these forums know what SQL even is, and would probably pronounce it S-Q-L,Maybe you didn't get the memo but they have servers in 25 countries and a dead or dormant account uses the equivalent of a drop of water in an olympic swimming pool , it's only 3 or maybe 4 rows of data on a cluster of SQL servers that can easily hold millions. It is only the active account that costs Inno to service. One of the longest and well known online games in history and you think it only has a couple 100K users ? I have worked on single websites with 50K+ paying subscribers , your numbers are way off.
Actually, no and no. I am an established Diamond farmer who has always relied on Wishing Wells first and foremost. And since I've been collecting them for quite a while, this nerf of Diamonds in GE is really just an annoyance. Certainly doesn't rise to the level of having my "feet knocked out from underneath" me.
And everything I could attack-fight before, I can still attack-fight, so you're wrong again. There is nothing in GE5 that is effective outside of GE5 that I can't get the equivalent elsewhere without ever having to mess with GE5. Forgotten Temple? Forget it. The defense boost is worthless to me in every city. The FP boost would be nice, but certainly not worth doing GE5 every week to get. The attacking boosts? The 40% attacking attack boost I can easily match, and the 40% attacking defense would be fine, but not really necessary to the way I fight in any of my cities, so not worth any extra effort to get.
In short, my story hasn't changed. There's nothing in GE5 that I need, certainly nothing that justifies bothering with altering my city or spending the resources to get. My objection to GE5 isn't what it did to my game, which is nothing*, it's to the fact that they could have done so much better...and didn't. It's crap, and only Inno apologists believe differently.
*The changes to GE1-4 did affect my game to some degree, but GE5 did not.
I'm guessing you're referring to still being able to fight through the first 4 levels of GE? Sure, I can as well, and that never changed. I don't see how I'm "wrong again" about that when I never even mentioned anything about that in the first place. When I was talking about people having their "feet knocked out from underneath them" I was referring almost purely to the loss in diamond income, which is substantial for those who used GE as a main source of diamonds. GE may not have been one of your main sources of diamonds, but it was for many, myself included.And everything I could attack-fight before, I can still attack-fight, so you're wrong again.
Ok so to start with, it's 40% attack AND defense for attacking army, PLUS 50% attack AND defense for defending army, in a 3x4 space! Again, can you add that to your city in other ways, of course you can. Can you add all of that to your city in the same 3x4 space? Not a chance! The attack (and defense) efficiency of your city instantly rises quite a bit with the construction of the FT, and it's disingenuous in the extreme to act as if you can possibly replicate that in any other way, because you simply can't. You can add sentinel outposts, winner's plazas, etc. to match that attack, sure, but the space required to match it would be MUCH greater; i.e. way less efficient.The attacking boosts? The 40% attacking attack boost I can easily match, and the 40% attacking defense would be fine, but not really necessary to the way I fight in any of my cities, so not worth any extra effort to get.
Again, just because that's your particular experience, doesn't mean it applies to everyone else. GE5 may not be worth it to you personally, but for many others, a 20% FP increase and a significant enhancement to a city's attack/defense efficiency is worth a heck of a lot, and to just gloss over that fact like it's irrelevant is not only dismissive, it's also pretty darn short-sighted and myopic.In short, my story hasn't changed. There's nothing in GE5 that I need, certainly nothing that justifies bothering with altering my city or spending the resources to get.
Maybe you didn't get the memo but they have servers in 25 countries and a dead or dormant account uses the equivalent of a drop of water in an olympic swimming pool , it's only 3 or maybe 4 rows of data on a cluster of SQL servers that can easily hold millions. It is only the active account that costs Inno to service. One of the longest and well known online games in history and you think it only has a couple 100K users ? I have worked on single websites with 50K+ paying subscribers , your numbers are way off.
Let me refresh your memory , you agreed 100% to this just up the page "FOE does not have 100s of thousands of people online at once lmfao" which is almost laughably low for a gaming environment as massive as FOE.