CDmark
Well-Known Member
I look at it like this, figurativelyYes, technically they have the right to do it, but it would seem to be a pretty dumb azz choice on their part, especially dumb in this context, where they gain nothing from choosing to be so petty and/or short sighted
Reduce diamonds by 50% is the first slap, put portraits in GE5 is the return backhand slap, like the 3 stooges where I am Curly and FOE is MOE. Any portraits in the last quarter, Encounters 13,14,15 where you get the large fragments is brutal. The attack and nego costs skyrocket, esp attack, and you have the possibility of getting a portrait, NO BUENO.
Now, let's look at Sharmon's situation, 8 seasons, no full feathered serpent. If he could have had the 25 fragments each time for encounter 15, he would have the building and I don't care if he would or would not place it, it is the point of putting the POSSIBILTY of a lame reward in a place where I think it shouldn't be due to the sacrifice to get there.
Now, I have seen the times where I get, for example, 90% frag FS and 10% frag FS, no portrait. I was wondering about it, what is the game doing. I am guessing now that you get 9 random portraits at the beginning and if you already have one, then the 10% slot is filled with fragments instead of the portrait you already have in inventory. I thought maybe, if they already screwed you 2x on a certain encounter like E15, 25 frags of FS, they would back off. I don't think that is the case. Sharmon has 8 portraits, hey, you are a 2 star Penacho, congrats!!!, that's Impressive (I had to sneak that one in there...lol)