DeletedUser35475
I would think if you can get someone else to build it for you then it pays for itself on the first collection!
Has anyone done an analysis for how long until Cape Canaveral pays for itself?
At various levels, with or without including a rental cost of the land it is on.
There is, however, a more important issue that many people don't consider. The Castel del Monte is a must have building for those serious about the game. The CdM provides much needed attack bonuses AND forge points, and it cost 20% less to level than a Cape. Though it's true the Cape does produce 67% more fps than the CdM (66.666 to be exact, your first clue the Cape is evil), considering the added value of the attack bonuses with the CdM, it seems silly to even consider a Cape until one has their CdM at max level. Especially considering there is essentially zero time required to recoup fps with a CdM, as it has immediate value.
... to be continued
I can't put any stock in the guide you have coming because of this paragraph. Not everyone is a fighter. You can be serious and successful in this game without being a fighter. I had my Cape at level 70 before even planting a CdM. I had been playing the game for over 3 years before I added it. And, to be honest, it was added more as a FP producer than an attack boost provider.
I can't put any stock in the guide you have coming because of this paragraph. Not everyone is a fighter. You can be serious and successful in this game without being a fighter. I had my Cape at level 70 before even planting a CdM. I had been playing the game for over 3 years before I added it. And, to be honest, it was added more as a FP producer than an attack boost provider.
So because you think you can play without a CdM, math does not apply to you. Gotcha.
So because you think you can play without a CdM, math does not apply to you. Gotcha.
You have not mathematically proven that the attack boost is worth more than the extra FP Cape produce.So because you think you can play without a CdM, math does not apply to you. Gotcha.
I actually minored in math in college, thanks. You are throwing blanket statements that may be true for a small percentage of players, but for the majority of players, the math lies with leveling the Cape before the CdM.
You have not mathematically proven that the attack boost is worth more than the extra FP Cape produce.
The OP is asking if anyone has done the calculations on how long a Cape Canaveral takes to pay for itself, not what style of play you prefer. Let's try and stay focused here.
There is, however, a more important issue that many people don't consider. The Castel del Monte is a must have building for those serious about the game. The CdM provides much needed attack bonuses AND forge points, and it cost 20% less to level than a Cape. Though it's true the Cape does produce 67% more fps than the CdM (66.666 to be exact, your first clue the Cape is evil), considering the added value of the attack bonuses with the CdM, it seems silly to even consider a Cape until one has their CdM at max level. Especially considering there is essentially zero time required to recoup fps with a CdM, as it has immediate value.
"minored" in math lol. So you took some math classes in college? Then you might want to consider this: The OP is asking how long it will take. I am answering that question, you are talking about a different topic all together.
You wasted your money on college, btw.
Because...? Or are we supposed to just take your word for it?An important message that most people probably don’t know is that you should not let your Cape sit at around level 20.
Yeah, let's only focus on what the OP wants, unless you want to try and make an off-topic point right? Good job, you frickin hypocrite.
So because I make a small comment within a post entirely dedicated to the calculations, which is what the OP is asking for (see top of page) I'm taking about a different topic? You need to look up what the word hypocrite means, because the way you're using it I take it to mean someone who is right and is do an apology from a name-caller.
Oh boy.
First, you necroed a thread that is over a year old.
Then, you posted that you should not build a Cape but instead a CdM first. You were the one not answering the question and talking about a different topic altogether. (Note- altogether is one word.) You went back and edited your posts- they put this nice little date and time stamp on them. You can clearly see that your post was last edited on the 19th, and my response to it was written on the 16th. Plus I quoted you, so it is obvious you were talking about your value of a CdM instead of actually answering the long ago asked question. You went off topic, not me. But nice try blaming it on me!.
1. There is no relevance to how old a thread is. It's the top hit on Google when searching the topic of - pay attention now - HOW LONG FOR CAPE CANAVERAL TO PAY FOR ITSELF. Instead of nitpicking, do you have any information to contribute on the OP? Strike 1.
2. If people can read, they can clearly see that my post was about answering the OP and doing the calculations, with a minor aside to consider the CdM, while your's was about how you prefer to play the game. You lie and say I changed the subject, as if people can somehow only read your posts and not scroll up and read mine. Strike 2
3. My typo on "altogether". Ouch, that was a zinger. I clearly would never win a debate of any kind with you. Ball one.
4. My editing posts means nothing. I have been added to my post as time permits. Again, I have done calculations and all you seem to be interested in is arguing with any leaf that falls from a tree. Strike 3, yer out!
1. There is no relevance to how old a thread is. It's the top hit on Google when searching the topic of - pay attention now - HOW LONG FOR CAPE CANAVERAL TO PAY FOR ITSELF. Instead of nitpicking, do you have any information to contribute on the OP? Strike 1.
2. If people can read, they can clearly see that my post was about answering the OP and doing the calculations, with a minor aside to consider the CdM, while your's was about how you prefer to play the game. You lie and say I changed the subject, as if people can somehow only read your posts and not scroll up and read mine. Strike 2
3. My typo on "altogether". Ouch, that was a zinger. I clearly would never win a debate of any kind with you. Ball one.
4. My editing posts means nothing. I have been adding to and clarifying my post as time permits. Again, I have done calculations and all you seem to be interested in is arguing with any leaf that falls from a tree. Strike 3, yer out!
Q: How long does a Cape take to pay for itself?
A: You should level your CDM first! It's more efficient, ok?
Yeah, that's on topic.