That's not what he said.
You guys are piling on for no good reason other than to make yourselves feel better somehow. Respond to what he said, not how you feel. Especially the guy who started this stupid thread throwing accusations of "gender bias" around. That's just hilarious.
If you can't tell the difference between entertainment value and the validity of an accomplishment, that's your problem, not mine. And I think it's hilarious that
@RazorbackPirate used the example of the US women's national soccer team, who could probably beat many male teams.
Bobby Fischer was an amazing chess player, but there was never any entertainment value in watching him play. And I like chess. It is incredible the power of weightlifters, both male and female, but I'd rather watch the grass grow. You get it? Entertainment value has nothing at all to do with the core value of an accomplishment.
And now that I think about it, usually when a record has an asterisk by it, it's because the person accomplished it with some sort of advantage. Like Roger Maris having more games in the season than Babe Ruth had. With his biases, it would make more sense to put the asterisk by the men's records. "His time is only the record because he had the unfair advantage of being a man."
I'm really surprised that you agree with him, by the way.