Algona
Well-Known Member
You're starting to remind me of Cosmic Raven in this thread. You apparently only want newbies to have your perspective for some reason.
Wowsers,
My perspective is straight forward, although not explicitly expressed to this thread, It's essentially the same for pretty much any aspect of the game in this case: that sets should be considered that they can be a good idea for some. How many? i don't know. The only way to figure that out is doing Risk and Cost Benefit Analyses.
Neither can be done without data. I based my opinion that they may be good on my personal experience of minimal plundering and a higher return per tile then any other source aside form GBs. Throw in what I see on the forum and in game. But I freely admit that's not a lot to go on and what others see in game and on the forum could be different.
Which is why I ask questions. You refuse to answer substantively.
Cost Benefit? Part of CBA is looking at the alternatives. You refuse to put any numbers on anything, just a blanket statements that this is better then that.
Risk? Again, you refuse to answer from your personal experience.
You are under no obligation to answer my questions. I'm under no obligation to give credence to your voluntarily unsubstantiated opinion.
You make blanket subjective statements of opinion. I'm asking folk to look at alternatives and want to dig deeper to see if maybe just maybe alternatives might be better.
I'll throw in this second dismissal as well.
Good for you.
You're the one who decided to bring posting style into this. Are you sure you picked the right posting style in this thread to compare to CR? Rhetorical question, i have no expectations that you would answer that substantively as well.
If you decide to take an objective look at numbers, I'll dig as deep as I can into whatever sources you want or that I can find. Otherwise, I'm done.