DeletedUser26965
In June of 2016 Inno said this "Basing on your feedback, we've come up with solutions that will patch some of the loopholes that were reported by you and were making it possible to 'farm' lots of ranking points"
Well, it didn't work. I'm on one of the worlds and in one of the guilds whose AA sectors are farmed daily so some goofballs can get their victory expansions. The same guild attacking numerous times a day, everyday, for months on end. It costs them 25 medals to lay siege, it costs us 40,000 medals to get the sector back if we didn't catch it in time. They don't care if they lose the sector as that's not what they're there for.
I'm quite certain GvG was not intended so people can farm AA for victory expansions. So, when will the silliness end?
Edit: Okay, so apparently I was wrong, like way wrong, here is the response I got regarding this issue in regards to point farming the AA GvG map it is: "a completely acceptable practice" their words.
What I don't understand and what this post is about is how inno can go to lengths to close one GvG point farming issue, call it abuse, then turn around and state the exact opposite with another GvG point farming issue calling it "a completely acceptable practice". Which is it, abuse or acceptable? it can't be both
Well, it didn't work. I'm on one of the worlds and in one of the guilds whose AA sectors are farmed daily so some goofballs can get their victory expansions. The same guild attacking numerous times a day, everyday, for months on end. It costs them 25 medals to lay siege, it costs us 40,000 medals to get the sector back if we didn't catch it in time. They don't care if they lose the sector as that's not what they're there for.
I'm quite certain GvG was not intended so people can farm AA for victory expansions. So, when will the silliness end?
Edit: Okay, so apparently I was wrong, like way wrong, here is the response I got regarding this issue in regards to point farming the AA GvG map it is: "a completely acceptable practice" their words.
What I don't understand and what this post is about is how inno can go to lengths to close one GvG point farming issue, call it abuse, then turn around and state the exact opposite with another GvG point farming issue calling it "a completely acceptable practice". Which is it, abuse or acceptable? it can't be both
Last edited by a moderator: