plinker2
Well-Known Member
This is a reasonable suggestion, not an attempt to stifle anyone. You should give it proper consideration.If you want to control every player in your guild, go back to GvG.
This is a reasonable suggestion, not an attempt to stifle anyone. You should give it proper consideration.If you want to control every player in your guild, go back to GvG.
It doesn't cost you anything!
Your use of caps is really not helpful. I am glad that you kept from adding multiple ?'s and/or !'s at the end of sentences though.
Answers like "hell no!", "go back to gvg", "we have comments from a top ten guild again" are not useful. If your goal is to stifle us, then you're simply trolling.
The goal of this thread is for INNO to get comments from players as the game goes active on production servers. We can discuss the merits from our point of view in a reasonable fashion or we might as well close the thread.
This is a reasonable suggestion, not an attempt to stifle anyone. You should give it proper consideration.
Tell that to any leader of a competitive Guild, and you may find yourself on vacation.
In most Guilds you need permission to breathe. They will remind you that no one forces you to stay and you are welcome to start your own Guild.
And you must complete GE in 24 hours or less.
There seems to be a very vocal minority in here that are against any kind of requested controls. Answers like "hell no!", "go back to gvg", "we have comments from a top ten guild again" are not useful. If your goal is to stifle us, then you're simply trolling.
If you choose not to use the requested logs, it doesn't affect you.
Some of us would like permissions to allow guildies to set the first battle on a province. The argument was that others did not want to have to give out those permissions.
Allow us the ability to kill a siege or, if you don't like me calling it a siege, maybe call it remove the banner. If anyone can start taking a province, we need to be able to stop one that has been started in the wrong place. We're the only ones that lose. We've wasted attacks, gained attrition and gained nothing else.
Tell that to any leader of a competitive Guild, and you may find yourself on vacation.
In most Guilds you need permission to breathe. They will remind you that no one forces you to stay and you are welcome to start your own Guild.
And you must complete GE in 24 hours or less.
I'm a little bit shocked at the moderators here. J
1- Player Logs is something guild leaders have asked for, and doesn't seem damaging to the system
2- Attack origination is something guild leaders have asked for, and doesn't seem damaging to the system
[3]Tile recognition (mouse over) and/or messaging (copy/paste, attach to message) seems desired by guild leaders
I will no longer entertain proposals from anyone calling anything a siege. That tells me you have no idea what you're talking about and come from a bent of wanting to stuff Battlegrounds into your worldview of GvG. No. In fact, you can stuff any idea that wants to stuff Battlegrounds into the GvG box.
Learn Battlegrounds and learn to speak Battlegrounds, talk about Banners, Advancements, Owners, etc. I might consider your idea, but until then, not a chance.
Also, to the control freaks coming out of the woodwork - Learn to communicate and educate your guild why having and following a strategy is both important and beneficial to your guild and guild mates. Any asks for detailed logs, new permission controls, attrition level displays, etc. are all non-starters with me. Don't ask Inno to paper over your deficiencies in organization and communication. Guild leaders should learn to lead, then actually lead.
Woah. That’s really hostile. We have a strong guild leadership team, but with 80 guild members and a challenging FoE messaging interface system, there’s no way to make sure everyone sees every message. The reason people are asking for these controls is that it’s currently a problem. Please take our concerns seriously.I will no longer entertain proposals from anyone calling anything a siege. That tells me you have no idea what you're talking about and come from a bent of wanting to stuff Battlegrounds into your worldview of GvG. No. In fact, you can stuff any idea that wants to stuff Battlegrounds into the GvG box.
Learn Battlegrounds and learn to speak Battlegrounds, talk about Banners, Advancements, Owners, etc. I might consider your idea, but until then, not a chance.
Also, to the control freaks coming out of the woodwork - Learn to communicate and educate your guild why having and following a strategy is both important and beneficial to your guild and guild mates. Any asks for detailed logs, new permission controls, attrition level displays, etc. are all non-starters with me. Don't ask Inno to paper over your deficiencies in organization and communication. Guild leaders should learn to lead, then actually lead.
The attack origination is in reference to log keeping. I.E "Attack on A2 started by 'MaliceKooper' .." I'm not personally a proponent of this, but it has multiple requests behind it, and doesn't seem like a bad thing.It is damaging if you need a guild leader available to continue to the next sector . Communication is key here . Plan the next sector to attack when you're close to taking the one before and you wouldn't need something as restrictive as a Leader/Founder permission
I have no problem with the moderators posting their opinion. I think my message was misunderstood, and I may have done a poor job communicating it. I'm shocked at the moderators "being" in here. Not that they did anything wrong, but more or less that they took a position on what seemed fairly obviously non-essential feedback. (I hope that is politically correct enough)No reason to be. Mods are unpaid volunteer players. It is explicitly stated in the forum rules that mods are entitled to have and post about their opinions.
If you think a mod broke a forum rule, feel free to report it.
Otherwise a fine post.
The attack origination is in reference to log keeping. I.E "Attack on A2 started by 'MaliceKooper' .." I'm not personally a proponent of this, but it has multiple requests behind it, and doesn't seem like a bad thing.
Too bad there's not a ❤ button instead of a simple likeI will no longer entertain proposals from anyone calling anything a siege. That tells me you have no idea what you're talking about and come from a bent of wanting to stuff Battlegrounds into your worldview of GvG. No. In fact, you can stuff any idea that wants to stuff Battlegrounds into the GvG box.
Learn Battlegrounds and learn to speak Battlegrounds, talk about Banners, Advancements, Owners, etc. I might consider your idea, but until then, not a chance.
Also, to the control freaks coming out of the woodwork - Learn to communicate and educate your guild why having and following a strategy is both important and beneficial to your guild and guild mates. Any asks for detailed logs, new permission controls, attrition level displays, etc. are all non-starters with me. Don't ask Inno to paper over your deficiencies in organization and communication. Guild leaders should learn to lead, then actually lead.
What's so challenging about it ??? Just make a thread titled appropriately and add the members to it . If your "MEMBERS" don't understand something so simple the you need to step up as a leader and lead .with 80 guild members and a challenging FoE messaging interface system, there’s no way to make sure everyone sees every message.