DeletedUser37533
@Buxer Jones wine is for seniors and divorced women. I drink vodka child and I'll be there.
I have not heard of that drink. What goes into it? (Besides vodka, of course.)I drink vodka child
Why am I not surprised? Did you tell them that the rash would quit and not return if they just didn't feed it medicines?@Stephen Longshanks I have given more than some an unexplained rash maybe 10. Antibiotics will clear that up though.
@m9silent12 not so much. Don't go away mad, just go away.
I have an orgy to attend and I'm not going to be real worried about foe
Coke, sprite, dry ginger ale, tonic water etcI have not heard of that drink. What goes into it? (Besides vodka, of course.)
I doubt it. Tucker grew on us in a good way. Tiny city deceiver is growing on us like an unexplained rash.
If you are posting a full, current defence then you are playing right into the hands of these asshats that have been giving you advice since day one. Yes their advice is very good, very good for strong attackers. This does not require analysis or comment. It is math. Deny them battle points. It's that simple.
I doubt it. Tucker grew on us in a good way. Tiny city deceiver is growing on us like an unexplained rash.
Awnser:NOTHING good.the world crumbles..PLZ dont disconnect alabaster....What happens if you disconnect Alabaster?
!
Are these players in higher eras than you? Or are they in the same or next higher era only with many more points?I believe you need to rethink your algorithm for placing players in neighborhoods. I keep getting up into neighborhoods with MUCH HIGH players who continually defeat and plunder the best army I can put up. It gets frustrating and causes people to drop out.
If you put everyone in neighborhoods what are minimally close to their level, the game will carry more excitement and appeal. I've dropped several cities because it just isn't worth the aggravation. In one world, I'm at 950,000. I'm third from the last in my neighborhood and the higher players are at 22 MILLION... Yes, MILLION. That's just ridiculous.
I always find it interesting when two people look at exactly the same facts and reach completely opposite conclusions. I'm in Contemporary with 36 million points and a 303% boost. In the same neighborhood are players with 500 thousand points and none of the military great buildings. Whatever possessd these players to advance so quickly that they cannot possibly compete I do not understand. But unlike others, I am not demanding that the rules be changed to protect these players from the consequences of their actions.I believe you need to rethink your algorithm for placing players in neighborhoods. I keep getting up into neighborhoods with MUCH HIGH players who continually defeat and plunder the best army I can put up. It gets frustrating and causes people to drop out.
If you put everyone in neighborhoods what are minimally close to their level, the game will carry more excitement and appeal. I've dropped several cities because it just isn't worth the aggravation. In one world, I'm at 950,000. I'm third from the last in my neighborhood and the higher players are at 22 MILLION... Yes, MILLION. That's just ridiculous.
I always find it interesting when two people look at exactly the same facts and reach completely opposite conclusions. I'm in Contemporary with 36 million points and a 303% boost. In the same neighborhood are players with 500 thousand points and none of the military great buildings. Whatever possessd these players to advance so quickly that they cannot possibly compete I do not understand. But unlike others, I am not demanding that the rules be changed to protect these players from the consequences of their actions.
I always find it interesting when two people look at exactly the same facts and reach completely opposite conclusions. I'm in Contemporary with 36 million points and a 303% boost. In the same neighborhood are players with 500 thousand points and none of the military great buildings. Whatever possessd these players to advance so quickly that they cannot possibly compete I do not understand. But unlike others, I am not demanding that the rules be changed to protect these players from the consequences of their actions.