No, but reporters write articles about peer reviewed studies in these publications and many of those reporters cite the original peer reviewed study they are reporting on.
But you already know all that, but since it does not fit your narrative, you'll just try to imply that the evidence is somehow suspect, or irrelevant.. So save your talking points, and the lame little 'gotcha' smiley for someone else.
And since I'm not going to do your homework for you, I just did a quick Google search and posted the first few links to the many articles that have reported that so far, 2018 is proving to be the coldest year on record. I know this, because it's been in the news lately, but I'm sure this is the first you've heard of it, and will simply dismiss it, since again, it doesn't fit your narrative.
So why don't you go read the articles, find the studies they're writing about, read those studies and come back to us why all those studies are invalid, and all those scientists are wrong. When you do come back,having read the studies, please let us know where you got your Doctorate in Climatology, and where you're currently employed in the field.
In the meantime, until you come back to prove those scientists wrong, I'll just trust what those scientists, you know, the ones actually working in the field, and doing the research have to say.