Sorry,
@LeCron. That noise ain't gonna cut it.
The evidence of Bot usage is overwhelming and has been for years. However, in all this time the one thing no one has been able to point to is an example where a player, obviously using bots, has had their account permanently removed. When the account remains, Inno has done nothing. Own it.
The burning question then becomes, why does Inno continue to do nothing? You can blah dee blah the topic till the cows come home, but until we see accounts disappearing, it's all just happy gas. So much happy gas, you ban the very discussion of the issue. I guess if we can't discuss Inno's inaction, Inno's inaction isn't really happening, right?
If you are doing something, prove it. Publicly. "Oh, but we can't because..." Nonsense. Change your rules to state anyone caught cheating will be publicly made an example of, and any negotiated settlements with accounts found in violation of the rules will have the details of the settlement made public. It's not like you're doxing people publicly announcing the screen name of guilty parties.
No. Inno set it up that way to hide behind their inaction. Inaction that benefits them financially, if only to allow them to not invest in the resources needed to find and eliminate cheaters. How do we know Inno benefits financially? Because if Inno thought, in any way, that enforcing the rules and being transparent about it would make them more money, they would have done so already.
You've read my posts over the years. You know I will defend Inno when defense is warranted. Here it is not. On this issue Inno's record is dismal. I get it. It's too expensive to deal with, so happy gas it is. I get that too. Blowing the smoke comes with the job.