DeletedUser26965
Okay, I'll restate my position from the start so it's clear, not to convince you of course because I could really care less what you think but to anyone who happens to be dazzled by your silliness. Understand, fundamentally no different means, in the context that I said it, that if an IA player today faces a player with a massive advantage such as with SoZ, CoA, CdM, AO, Kraken etc., they are no better off than facing them than they are higher age units, they get crushed just as equally and just as equally have no recourse for even the slightest hint at revenge. It simply amazes me how this has to be explained to anyone.Now you play the victim? Too sad. You simply try every technique to win an argument, except those things relevant to it. Which you can't.
To your point, there might be one or two more, duh, but there are many hoods where none are that big. Before you'd end up in hoods where 50 guys were above you, and the ones below you were defenseless too.
I can compete with IA guys, even if I end up losing the battles. I can't compete with FE guys. If I struggle, I can stay in that age, improve my combat abilities, and compete even better. I have some control over where I land.
It's better than it was. Stop taking up a stupid argument that you know isn't true. Just clarify your thinking, and present it as it's better than it was, but it still needs improvement. You'd have more people that agree with you, and I might be one of them. But, if you say it's the same, it's difficult for anyone to agree because it's clearly false.
Now if someone wants to take the obvious and try to be dismissive, demeaning, minimize it, or portray as if they know without providing anything, that's on them, it's not on me to help them understand if they're that blinded.
Last edited by a moderator: