While obviously asking for expansions is pretty much a moot point, we know they aren't going to do it, I don't think it's a topic that should just be ignored. In order for them to know there is a problem or even a desire their players are facing then their players need to talk about it.
The issue I am seeing with my own members (in our Guild Family we have about 1800 across 24-ish guilds) is that older players are indeed losing interest, and far too many newer ones are finding the game confusing with the constant jet-stream of promotions coming at them before they understand the fundamentals of FOE.
I am fairly new to the game and I have seen the change too... more events, and then sets as prices. My city looks like a collection of special buildings! but that is my choice. I decided to finish the questlines and I decided to build those. I also made the decision that when the building doesn't make sense anymore, it is going to be deleted; just like some production, army, good buildings. They serve their purpose, we need to hit the delete and move on. If you are the type of player that wants to have one of everything, then you need to work on winning medals etc for expansions... these are options we have, decisions we make, according to what parts of the game you find more enjoyable (just as there are farmers, fighters, etc) if expansions are a sort of stress, they are not allowing you to enjoy this game, ignore this questline, simple.Mike I understand where you are coming from as I field the same complaints in guild chat from my mates about lack of space and new events...in every instance, I view their city and see Bazaars, WW's, Caravanserys, etc. all items I deem deletable. In fact everything in my city is deletable except my GBs and SoK's That's MY perspective on city planning for my game play style and allows me more flexibility in gathering event buildings. If you really want it, you will make room. I love my Japanese garden set and the 5 fps it produces daily but it consumes 25 tiles and if another set or building comes along that rivals it, my finger will be a blur on the delete button. So the real question is are these buildings worthless on a tile for tile basis for what you already have in your given age? If so, that should be your concern, not more expansions.
The current formula for expansions was done prior to the introduction of all of these new event buildings. So when the designers that came up with the size limits of the city did so, they were doing it to fit in many fewer buildings. With more buildings comes the need for more land. So you are stuck between deleting items you don't want to or not playing the questlines to get the new buildings.
.
I don't think anyone ever felt they had enough room to put all their stuff in their cities so this isn't a new concern. If you asked any player now or when I started if they wanted more expansions the answer would be yes.This is a good point. Also last year sometime the whole area around the cities was expanded to accommodate more land expansions, I am guessing this was done because the top players had used all the available land and also the introduction of OE.
Medals are so much easier to get now than they have ever been.I also feel that the huge gaps between medal expansions needs reviewing, imho they are disproportionate to what the average player can realistically acquire. The danger in trying to stretch out the game too far is that players will get to a certain point and then lose interest due to the game slowing down as they run out of space and things like medal expansions seem too out of reach.
I think there may be a problem of perception as a lot more expansions were made available in AF and OF (and maybe FE I don't recall) than in prior ages. So maybe players in later ages don't feel the space crunch as much.
That's not what I mean. I don't think there is a medal gap - like I said medals are much easier to get now - but there is a gap in the total number of expansions by age since AF and OF each have (or will have) 4 ages worth of expansions.That is my point, I mentioned the average player finds the huge gap between medal expansions almost disheartening. The top players will not as they have medals rolling in from lots of high level swaps which are further boosted by high level ARCs, so as you say they are not feeling the crunch like most of the other players.
That's not what I mean. I don't think there is a medal gap - like I said medals are much easier to get now - but there is a gap in the total number of expansions by age since AF and OF each have (or will have) 4 ages worth of expansions.
The medal amounts were set before medals were given out like candy in events and GBs like arc were introduced. I just don't see an issue with the number of medals required for expansions.
I just don't see it. There are just far more medals available now than before. If you're camping out in an era for a year I can see it seeming to be too slow but that comes with the territory.Fair enough, but just because you don't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Fair enough, but just because you don't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
I just don't see it. There are just far more medals available now than before. If you're camping out in an era for a year I can see it seeming to be too slow but that comes with the territory.
If it takes an arc to get them build an arc.
I agree. I just wish everyone who's posted about it so far (and all those who haven't yet) would read the following post:It deserves discussion in my book since it is DISCUSSED CONSTANTLY in the game itself.
I can't put it any better than that. I cut down to 1 supply building in my city (after collecting a 10+ million surplus of course) and that's also enabled me to get away with having only 4 residentals + lord's manor.Algona, I can't figure out a way to be equitable about new expansions unless its a one-shot, one expansion, yearly bonus for every player regardless of age. Given by INNO. For free. For playing the game. It wont advance the game too much for lower era players but would be extremely valuable for high era players. The real question is why would INNO do this? They have made it clear expansions aren't on the table for event prizes or anything else for that matter. My opinion is INNO views land acquisition and city planning as the most important part of the game and its greatest challenge and doesn't view new event buildings as a negative but as an increase in that challenge
Based off your previous response, one can only deduct that you recently learned what a forum is. Congratulations you can read a dictionary. KekI understand completely what a forum is. I stated my opinion of all these whiners crying for expansions when its a verboten topic to begin with. The other use of a forum is gentlemanly debate. Your argument or opinion loses weight when you insult somebody or name call.