Just a thought, if the fires that bad you'll only be able to save one.... What's the chances the fire would have already rendered the embryos dead from the rising temperature?
And if you take the embryos out of the freezer do you know how to keep them viable once you save them or did you just kill both the 10k and the 5-year dead?
The scenario was obviously designed the same as if there was an elderly and a child in danger. How do you pick which one to save? It's fine for situations where everyone's lives are in absolute danger to decide which is the best to save. However saving one over the other in a life or death situation doesn't excuse killing one when their life was never in danger.
the child obviously IN both situations mentioned.
#1 as you pointed out, the fire tempatures could have killed the embreyos already..
also the already 5 year old child has more potential to society as a whole then 10k of *we arent sure if they are alive* embreyos.
In the elderly/child situation..
the child wins every time, cause it has a higher of chanceof benifiting socieciety then a almost dead person does.
Logic can solve anything!yey!
also, i forgot who was talking about disabilities earlier, but what level of disability are we talking about here.
cause if we are talking about ALL disability, then 3-4% of babies deserve to die each year!
I think that abortion should be banned, and that society needs to get some responsibility.
the fact that a underage person is saying this is weird, but commenting off other people:
Sex should not be a recreational activity, it should be only used when the need arises to procreate with your mate.
Also the person who said that all boys should get a vasectomy at puberty is Stupid.
Ohh a sidenote here:
if we killed all children with disabilitys, id be dead because i am level one on the autism spectrum, i have a condition which used to be known as aspergers syndrome before DSM-5.
(sorry for the run on sentence)