CaptainKirk1234
Active Member
Just the opposite, I am saying that like in life there are some thing you just have to deal with. And life is competitive, and the game can also be unfair to people,
-
We are looking for you! Always wanted to join our Supporting Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
Take a look at our recruitement page for more information and how you can apply:
When can we stop pretending GBG is balanced?
- Thread starter Helmet Bro
- Start date
CrabbyOldMan
Member
I agree totally. My guild of 28 members totally kicks butt in platinum. But when we get to Diamond we face guilds of 60-80 members and end up having to sit out. If Inno would take into account the guild size when creating the match-ups it would make the whole thing more equitable. Or perhaps set the bar higher before advancing to Diamond?
Robbenn
Member
You can't take into account the guild size because guild size doesn't say anything about GBG activity.
JoyfulRider
Member
Good Question.
When can we stop pretending GBG is balanced?
Answer: Today, Just now stopped pretending it.
Are you still pretending it, please don't do that. It will make you lose your precious time very much.
Special Note:
If you feel like pretending it any day, read the answer above.
Happy forging!!
When can we stop pretending GBG is balanced?
Answer: Today, Just now stopped pretending it.
Are you still pretending it, please don't do that. It will make you lose your precious time very much.
Special Note:
If you feel like pretending it any day, read the answer above.
Happy forging!!
Last edited:
Fishercat.
Member
It's not Battlegrounds any more, it's farmgrounds. Inno didn't intend for all of this map gridding when they made GbG, so how do they solve the new problem of guilds not competing against each other and instead farming rewards alongside each other?So in conclusion, @Helmet Bro , don't be surprised that inno does this. They are trying to reverse the farming and bring the battle back to battlegrounds. Because right now, victory points are taking backseat to rewards and farming. Thats my 2 cents
FoE has a lot of features that encourage cooperation and community building. There are enough that I've theorized that cooperation among players and guilds is a continuing guiding principle of their design team. Much like the lesson of Civilization (the board game) is that war is a losing proposition. Perhaps the farming economics of GbG is intentional, and not a mistake.
MJ Artisan of War
Well-Known Member
After over 600 replies... When will we stop pretending that this thread matters?
JoyfulRider
Member
oops....@fishercat, myself surprised to see you for replying a 5 months old comment in this thread. (Also, myself not replying to you).
Encourage, unfair, imbalance, guiding, mistake and so many things,
It will finally come into the following variants:
1) people wants some changes in GBG according to their favour.
2) people doesn't want changes in GBG, since it has already going in their favour.
Everyone has to decide which variant they are now. If anyone falls under 1st variant, please adapt yourself to become 2nd variant. Also, in the game, everyone must have faced the 1st variant and now they should be or expecting to be in 2nd variant.
That's the game design.
Now if they change the GBG to make support for newbies or medium level persons to Play GBG without any trouble with High-Low mix guild, then older players who fought for many years in GBG to gain the strength, what will be the answer to them. It should be like,
"Sorry guys, you played the game in the wrong time". Is it acceptable? Just think, does it make any sense to do change in GBG, where everyone have a fair chance to become stronger slowly (for 2nd variant).
FINAL ANSWER:
NO ONE IS PRETENDING. IF ANYONE DOES STILL, THEY JUST DO IT TO KEEP THIS THREAD ALIVE (INCLUDING MYSELF WHILE TYPING THIS MESSAGE).
Encourage, unfair, imbalance, guiding, mistake and so many things,
It will finally come into the following variants:
1) people wants some changes in GBG according to their favour.
2) people doesn't want changes in GBG, since it has already going in their favour.
Everyone has to decide which variant they are now. If anyone falls under 1st variant, please adapt yourself to become 2nd variant. Also, in the game, everyone must have faced the 1st variant and now they should be or expecting to be in 2nd variant.
That's the game design.
Now if they change the GBG to make support for newbies or medium level persons to Play GBG without any trouble with High-Low mix guild, then older players who fought for many years in GBG to gain the strength, what will be the answer to them. It should be like,
"Sorry guys, you played the game in the wrong time". Is it acceptable? Just think, does it make any sense to do change in GBG, where everyone have a fair chance to become stronger slowly (for 2nd variant).
FINAL ANSWER:
NO ONE IS PRETENDING. IF ANYONE DOES STILL, THEY JUST DO IT TO KEEP THIS THREAD ALIVE (INCLUDING MYSELF WHILE TYPING THIS MESSAGE).
Fishercat.
Member
Ah. That was a mush-for-brains moment, too early in the morning. I hadn't realized how old the post was.
Kranyar the Mysterious
Well-Known Member
On the other hand denial still works, and it often works even better than pretending!
MJ Artisan of War
Well-Known Member
It really is more than just a river in Egypt....
Kranyar the Mysterious
Well-Known Member
No it isn't !
Tony 85 the Generous
Well-Known Member
I'm not pretending. Never has. GBG isn't balanced. The league points system to group guilds for a season is flawed. I'm not pretending it isn't.
Johnny B. Goode
Well-Known Member
I'm going to try pretending that there is no whining on the Forum...or crying in baseball.
Ebeondi Asi
Well-Known Member
-
Last edited:
Lord Pest
Well-Known Member
Thank you for saying this... will this thread never die? If I was a moderator the first thing I’d do is lock this thread.
Wildelk68
Member
The real problems with GBG are 2 or more of the more powerful guilds in a particular league teaming together and controlling all the sectors by rotating them every 4 hours between themselves! This could easily be equalized by limiting the number of sectors any one guild could hold at one time. Second the reduction of building slots didnot make much difference in my opinion and probably cost INNO some diamonds in the process and lastly 11 days is just too darn long a season. Reduce it to 7 or 8 days give players a break to build up some troops and guilds a chance to renew goods! You might find more interest in GBG!
Algona
Well-Known Member
I think one live thread about GBG is prolly better then what would occur otherwise: a new thread on GBG every time a player wanted to kvetch about GBG.
We get that now with plundering, complete with the person complaining about plundering noting they didn't find any other threads about plundering.
It's a lot easier to tell someone to read this thread to see how their 'great new insights' into GBG have already been addressed repeatedly then to try to explain in each new thread that, no, really, the GBG horse is not just dead but disintegrated.
Wildelk68
Member
Sounds like you are a member of the cancel culture! This is a forum where opinions and complaints can be aired! Even whiners have a voice! If that bothers you then don't follow this forum!
Fishercat.
Member
Whiners do have a voice. But it's not a binary choice between tolerating kvetching and participating in a community that interests you. If you think someone adds more noise than signal, it's easy enough to hit "ignore."
RazorbackPirate
Well-Known Member
Triggered much?