'sniping is someone coming in after you've put a lot of FPs on a GB and "sniping" the spot from you with a big donation.'
Since when is putting any size donation FIRST entitle you to the first spot. Unless you have the entire amount, whoever donates THE MOST gets the spot.
No I don't approve of you getting first place because you posted a large amount before anyone else did. Fairness is as long as the GB hasn't ben leveled if you want to dump 100 and someone else has dumped 50, they get second.
You know, after you post something you can still go back and edit the typos. I've done it a few times when I've noticed a misspelled word, or when I've changed a word as I wrote that then makes the grammar of a sentence wrong.I apologize for the typos...its 5am and I just got off duty. Should have proofread before posting.
Done...thank you brother...You know, after you post something you can still go back and edit the typos. I've done it a few times when I've noticed a misspelled word, or when I've changed a word as I wrote that then makes the grammar of a sentence wrong.
I appreciate your input but I believe it actually has been settled. Stephen Longshanks uses the ethics of subjectivism as does everyone else posting on here who agrees that's commented including your description of it. Since we know this to be the case then we can say that "sniping" is "wrong" only to those who believe it to be.Mr Longshanks & Sloppyjoeslayer.....in the truest sense, both of you are right. The conflict here is that you're views of this topic exist on different planes.
Sloppyjoeslayer is on the practical..tactical...physical proof and logic end of the spectrum. His logic can be proven and measured. Practical and scientific. In a phrase "just the facts". His view will be correct...because it cannot be reduced or disproven.
One the other end of the spectrum is Mr. Longshanks. His view is also correct. But from a moral standpoint. Moral volume cannot be physically measured or proven. It cannot be validated by fact...or tactical presentation. It exists only in our own humanity. Its an immeasurable entity..such as love and faith. The truth is guys..the world is comprised of the things at which are on sjs end of the spectrum. But what makes it good..are the imeasurables in our hearts and minds. The things on Mr Longshanks end.
I myself would never "snipe a guilmate". But that doesn't make sense to sjs because he's attempting to physically "measure"my logic.
This argument cannot be successfully or definitively settled. Because instead of comparing apples to oranges. Its more like comparing apples to swiss army knives. Its not two different points of view..its two views coming from different points.
I value the opinions/input of BOTH of you. But this battle can't be won...
And I only believe it to be wrong when it's one guildmate sniping another. Otherwise, it's right as rain.I appreciate your input but I believe it actually has been settled. Stephen Longshanks uses the ethics of subjectivism as does everyone else posting on here who agrees that's commented including your description of it. Since we know this to be the case then we can say that "sniping" is "wrong" only to those who believe it to be.
I don't have an unopened quart of Scotch handy
Single Malt all the way please.