DeletedUser24787
grtz ardak you been speeding thru the ages
i still refuse to leave progressive age
i still refuse to leave progressive age
Last edited by a moderator:
Incorrect mate. By my count that's 141 watchfires to give you the amount of def, so we'll say "give or take a few" on that number.No loss of production here due to my City Defense.
If you don't care about your guild's gvg
But here is something else to illustrate my point, that watchfires are a waste unless you are willing to go to 500%:
shocker, dumb city AI, I'm sure you vote no to a smarter AI not hitting RoguesIncorrect mate. By my count that's 141 watchfires to give you the amount of def, so we'll say "give or take a few" on that number.
You are in future era.
So by having watchfires instead of victory towers you are missing out on over 25,000 medals weekly.
Considering medals let you finish off your expansions and contribute to all ages gvg it's quite significant production to be missing out on imo.
If you don't care about your guild's gvg then more power to you. But here is something else to illustrate my point, that watchfires are a waste unless you are willing to go to 500%:
He even had 30% attack too, still no losses.
get obs/atom/arc THEY WORKGvG is costly.
GvG is costly.
He may be talking about the cost to maintain sufficient troops to set sieges, fight and supply defense armies, none of which would be covered by those GBs. Alcatraz helps, but you still need many barracks, which would take more room than his Watchfires.get obs/atom/arc THEY WORK
He may be talking about
That would make rogues completely pointless, but no I wouldn't vote against it.shocker, dumb city AI, I'm sure you vote no to a smarter AI not hitting Rogues
Beta, started today.Interesting, is that on US or on beta?
Brilliant forum work there, love it, and yes looks like I've found the Watchfire button after all lol.